Title
Secretary of Department of Transportation and Communication vs. Mabalot
Case
G.R. No. 138200
Decision Date
Feb 27, 2002
DOTC Secretary issued orders transferring LTFRB regional functions to DOTC-CAR; RTC nullified orders, but SC upheld validity, citing presidential reorganization authority and good faith.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-6)

Key Dates

· February 19, 1996 – DOTC Memorandum Order No. 96-735 issued.
· March 13, 1996 – Mabalot’s petition for certiorari, prohibition, and preliminary relief filed.
· March 20, 1996 and April 8, 1996 – RTC issues TRO and preliminary injunction, respectively.
· January 29, 1997 – DOTC Department Order No. 97-1025 issued.
· March 31, 1999 – RTC renders decision declaring both orders void.
· February 27, 2002 – Supreme Court decision under review, applying the 1987 Constitution.

Applicable Law

· 1987 Constitution, Article VII (Executive reorganization), Article IX-B (Office Holders’ Prohibitions).
· Administrative Order No. 36 (September 23, 1987) – Mandates establishment of regional offices in CAR.
· Executive Order No. 220 (July 15, 1987) – Defines CAR territorial coverage.
· Executive Order No. 292 (Administrative Code of 1987), Section 17 (agency creation) and Section 20 (residual powers).
· Presidential Decree No. 1416, as amended by P.D. 1772 – Grants President continuing authority to reorganize.
· General Appropriations Acts (R.A. 7645, 8174, 8250) – Authorize organizational changes by the President.

Facts

The DOTC Secretary, relying on Administrative Order No. 36 and Executive Order No. 220, directed the LTFRB Central Office to transfer its regional functions to DOTC-CAR, to be performed by organic DOTC-CAR personnel under LTFRB supervision, pending creation of a regular LTFRB-CAR. Mabalot challenged both the February 1996 Memorandum Order and January 1997 Department Order in RTC, securing injunctive relief. The RTC ultimately invalidated both orders as unlawful exercises of legislative power and violative of constitutional prohibitions on dual office-holding.

Issue

Whether the DOTC Secretary validly reorganized executive functions by issuing Memorandum Order No. 96-735 and Department Order No. 97-1025, or whether such transfers usurped legislative power and breached constitutional office-holding prohibitions.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court reversed and set aside the RTC decision, upholding the validity of both administrative orders.

Reasoning

  1. Under the 1987 Constitution, the President exercises control over executive departments and may reorganize them by authority of law.
  2. Administrative Order No. 36, issued by the President, unequivocally directed departmental heads to establish regional offices in CAR, thereby delegating authority to implement such creation to the DOTC Secretary.
  3. Presidential Decrees 1416 and 1772 remain operative, granting the President continuing authority to create, abolish, merge offices, and transfer functions. Cabinet secretaries act as the President’s alter ego in executing such directives.
  4. General Appropriations Acts contain express riders authorizing reorganization of executive agencies, presumptively constitutional absent explic

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.