Case Summary (G.R. No. L-43204)
Facts of the Case
On March 26, 1971, Mila Saril experienced severe stomach pains during her class, leading to her hospitalization at Biscom Hospital, where she died the next day, with the cause listed as "internal hemorrhage secondary to acute enterocolitis." Following her death, her husband reported the incident and subsequently filed a notice for compensation with the Workmen's Compensation Unit on May 14, 1971. The claim faced initial controversion, arguing that the cause of death was not connected to her employment, which led to a lengthy deliberation on the case.
Procedural History
After a series of hearings and motions filed by both parties, including delays in the employer's submission of evidence, an award was eventually issued by the Hearing Officer in favor of Rodito Saril on July 28, 1975. This award encompassed both compensation and burial reimbursements totaling P6,200. Following this, the Office of the Solicitor General attempted to overturn the award, claiming the government did not receive prior notices concerning the hearing and failed to present evidence. However, the Referee denied their motion to set aside the award, prompting the case's escalation to the Workmen's Compensation Commission for further review.
Commission's Decision and Rationale
On December 30, 1975, the Commission set aside the referee's award, reasoning that even without contesting the claim, there was insufficient evidence establishing that Mila Saril’s death was work-related. The Commission referenced a physician’s report indicating no causal relationship between her ailment and her employment, prompting concerns that the illness arose from factors unrelated to her job.
Legal Issues Raised
Rodito Saril contested the Commission's decision, arguing that the employer did not properly contest the claim nor submit timely evidence, thus waiving their right to dispute the compensation claim. He asserted that the presumptions laid out in the Workmen’s Compensation Act should favor his claim due to the lack of timely employer rebuttals, which constituted a renunciation of their right to challenge the compensation.
Statutory Provisions
The Court emphasized Section 45, paragraph 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, which mandates timely notification and evidence submission from the employer if they intend to contest a claim. The petitioner's circumstances provided valid grounds for compensation despite the employer's failure to meet its procedural obligations, which solidified the claim's validity under the presumption of compensability established in Section 44 of the Act.
Judicial Reasoning
The Court asserted that the legal presumption of compensability applies when a workers' ailment or death occurs during employment. It cited previous rulings that reaffirmed that attributabl
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. L-43204)
Case Overview
- The case involves Rodito T. Saril and his three minor children seeking compensation following the death of Mila Luz T. Saril, who was employed as a teacher.
- The case was decided by the First Division of the Supreme Court of the Philippines on July 31, 1978, under G.R. No. L-43204.
- Mila Saril died on March 27, 1971, due to internal hemorrhage secondary to acute enterocolitis while she was pregnant.
Facts of the Case
- Mila Luz T. Saril was employed at the To-oy Elementary School in Himamaylan, Negros Occidental, with a monthly salary of P245.00.
- On March 26, 1971, Mila experienced acute stomach pains and was taken to Biscom Hospital, where she died the following day.
- Rodito Saril promptly notified the District Supervisor about her death, who then appointed a substitute teacher.
- On May 14, 1971, Rodito filed a "Notice of claim for compensation in death cases" with the Workmen's Compensation Unit in Bacolod City.
Procedural History
- The Sub-Regional Office received a letter from the Assistant Solicitor General indicating a "tentative controversion" regarding the claim, stating that the cause of death was not clearly linked to employment.
- Several postponements of hearings occurred between October 1971 and September 1974, during which Rodito submitted evidence.
- On July 28, 1975, the Hearing Officer ruled in favor of Rodito, awarding P6,200