Title
Santos vs. Raymundo
Case
A.M. No. P-08-2555
Decision Date
Nov 26, 2019
Court employee dismissed for borrowing from complainant, failing to repay, and defying court orders, violating integrity and insubordination rules.

Case Summary (A.M. No. P-08-2555)

Background of the Complaint

In a sworn letter-complaint dated March 24, 2008, Santos alleged that Raymundo borrowed P100,000 from her, issued dishonored checks in payment, and engaged in conduct unbecoming of a court employee through verbal abuse during debt collection. Lucero and Fajardo also borrowed smaller amounts from Santos and were similarly accused of disrespectful conduct. Santos filed both criminal and civil actions against them, along with this administrative complaint.

Respondents' Counterclaims

Fajardo denied the allegations, claiming that Santos was the one who humiliated him and filed a counter-complaint for defamation. He argued that non-payment of debt should only lead to civil actions, not administrative complaints. Lucero acknowledged borrowing but contended he had repaid Santos and accused her of retaliatory actions. Raymundo admitted to the loan but claimed to have made several payments and accused Santos of attempting to steal her mobile phone as repayment.

Investigation Process

The case was initially referred to the executive judge of the Pasig MeTC for investigation. During several hearings conducted by Judge Marina Gaerlan-Mejorada, some parties filed motions to dismiss based on amicable settlements they had reached with Santos, leading her to withdraw her complaints against Lucero and Fajardo.

Compromise Agreements

On April 21, 2009, Santos and Raymundo submitted a Compromise Agreement stating Raymundo owed Santos P225,000 and agreed to monthly payments of P2,500, which included provisions for future loans to pay off the debt. Judge Mejorada’s report emphasized the necessity of maintaining integrity and honesty among court personnel, indicating that failure to settle just debts could warrant administrative action.

Findings and Recommendations

Judge Mejorada found the respondents guilty of conduct unbecoming of a court employee, recommending a reprimand with the warning that further infractions would incur more severe penalties. The court adopted these recommendations.

Subsequent Violations

Santos later reported that Raymundo failed to adhere to the compromise agreement, leading to further evaluations and recommendations from the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA). The OCA established that Raymundo intentionally disregarded her obligations and recommended a suspension of 30 days without pay for the second instance of misconduct.

Continuing Non-Compliance

Despite recommendations for compliance, Raymundo continued to evade her obligations, prompting further complaints from Santos. The OCA ultimately found her actions indicative of gross in

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.