Title
Santos vs. Heirs of Mariano
Case
G.R. No. 143325
Decision Date
Oct 24, 2000
Heirs contested Irene's unauthorized property sales; courts ruled deeds null, restored ownership, and awarded damages due to lack of valid consent.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 143325)

Factual Background

Macario and Irene were the owners of six parcels of land, acquired titles for which were executed posthumously after Macario's death without a will in 1972. Their estate was settled via an "Indenture of Extra-Judicial Settlement" by which land titles were transferred to Jose and Erlinda and their mother, Irene. Subsequently, Irene executed an Affidavit of Merger merging these lots into her name, leading to new titles. Irene then married Rolando Relucio in December 1974, which was later annulled due to Rolando's prior marriage.

Key Transactions

Irene sold the six parcels of land to Raul Santos on April 15, 1975, and again sold some of those lots on March 10, 1982, to Raul. Lot No. 612 was sold separately to Greta Tinga de los Reyes. However, throughout each transaction and subsequent marital changes, Irene maintained possession and control over the properties, paying taxes and developing structures such as the "Monica Inn." She later passed away in 1988, after which her adopted children discovered the sales to Raul.

Discovery of Fraud

Upon discovery, Jose and Erlinda questioned the legitimacy of the 1975 deed of sale, leading to an examination by the National Bureau of Investigation which raised concerns about the authenticity of the document. Following these concerns, the heirs initiated legal actions for annulment against various parties, including Raul.

Judicial Proceedings

A lawsuit was filed for the annulment of the sales and titled properties, which culminated in a Joint Judgment from the Regional Trial Court that favored the defendants, upholding the validity of the deeds previously executed by Irene. Following appeals, the Court of Appeals granted a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, ultimately leading to a ruling that declared the deeds of sale null and void.

Appellants' Arguments

Petitioners, Raul and associated parties, raised issues such as the claimed validity of previous Supreme Court findings on the earlier deeds and argued procedural errors regarding the introduction of new evidence. The court noted that the existence of valid contracts depends on essential elements such as consent and the meeting of minds, which the evidence reportedly failed to substantiate.

Decision of the Court

The Supreme Court ultimately found no merit in the petition, ass

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.