Title
Supreme Court
Santiago vs. Ferdo
Case
A.M. No. P-22-053
Decision Date
Jan 17, 2023
Clerk III Romelito Fernando found guilty of Gross Insubordination and Grave Misconduct for delaying case resolutions, withholding records, and soliciting P40,000 from a litigant. Penalties include forfeiture of benefits, perpetual disqualification, and a P300,000 fine.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 199894)

Antecedent Facts

On August 11, 2015, Judge Santiago filed a Complaint against Fernando, asserting charges of Insubordination, Irregularity in the Performance of Duty, and Gross Neglect of Duty. He highlighted Fernando's failure to adhere to direct instructions regarding the timely submission of the Formal Offer in two land registration cases, leading to delays in judicial resolution. In a subsequent Supplemental Complaint dated October 5, 2015, Judge Santiago further accused him of Continued Irregularities, Gross Incompetence, and Gross Misconduct, particularly concerning allegations that Fernando solicited money from a litigant to facilitate bail for her son.

Respondent's Defense

In response to the original Complaint, Fernando contended that any delays were unintentional, attributing his shortcomings to a heavy workload. He claimed that responsibilities for the delay in documentation fell to co-workers. In the Supplemental Complaint, he also denied the assertions regarding the solicitation of funds and did not file a Comment as directed, alleging health issues and subsequently going AWOL.

Findings by the Office of the Court Administrator

The OCA recommended that Fernando be found guilty of Gross Insubordination and Grave Misconduct, ultimately recommending dismissal from service. However, as he had already been dropped from the rolls for AWOL status, the recommendation was adjusted to accessory penalties, including forfeiture of benefits and perpetual disqualification from re-employment in government.

Issue for Resolution

The Court's primary inquiry was whether Fernando could be held administratively liable for Gross Insubordination and Grave Misconduct.

Court's Ruling on Preliminary Matters

The Court upheld the applicability of the revised disciplinary framework under A.M. No. 21-08-09-SC (Revised Rule 140), effective April 4, 2022. It affirmed that Fernando's absence during the proceedings did not preclude the Court's jurisdiction or the possibility of administrative liability.

Substantive Matters and Findings

Upon reviewing the circumstances, the Court agreed with the OCA's findings but added a count of Gross Insubordination for Fernando's failure to comply with directives to comment on the Supplemental Complaint. This characterized a willful disregard of lawful orders. The Court reinforced that judicial staff must maintain appropriate conduct and cooperate with investigations into their actions.

Definition and Application of Gross Misconduct

The Court classified Fernando’s actions constituting Grave Misconduct as serious transgressions that undermine judicial integrity. The unlawful receipt of money from litigants repr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.