Title
Santiago vs. Employees' Compensation Commission
Case
G.R. No. L-47405
Decision Date
Sep 12, 1980
Teacher's kidney ailment linked to strenuous work, heat exposure; SC ruled compensable under P.D. 626, awarding disability benefits.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 212656-57)

Background and Employment History

Clarita Santiago was employed as a classroom teacher at the Bureau of Elementary Education since 1956, stationed at Guerilla Elementary School in Bo. Concepcion, San Pablo City. Notably, Santiago experienced significant health problems beginning March 25, 1975, leading to hospitalization in May 1976, where she was diagnosed with severe kidney conditions. Her employment history included not just classroom instruction but also considerable involvement in extracurricular and community activities.

Claim for Compensation

On July 26, 1976, Santiago filed a claim for income benefits with the GSIS, asserting that her worsening health was due to her occupational responsibilities. However, her claim was denied on August 5, 1976, based on the GSIS's conclusion that her ailments were not classified as occupational diseases according to the applicable guidelines. This denial prompted Santiago to request reconsideration and subsequently appeal to the Employees' Compensation Commission after her request was rejected.

Commission's Decision and Rationale

The Employees' Compensation Commission reviewed Santiago’s case and upheld the GSIS's decision. They concluded that Santiago's primary medical issue was "Staghorn Calculi," with "pyelonephritis" being secondary. The Commission outlined that staghorn calculi, often leading to kidney infections, cannot be considered an occupational disease under the definitions provided in P.D. No. 626. Moreover, the Commission asserted the absence of substantial evidence linking her ailments to her employment conditions, citing that mere assertions made by Santiago lacked credible evidence.

Examination of Evidence

The Commission pointed out the lack of corroborative evidence to support Santiago's claims regarding the environment inside her classroom, notably, her assertion about excessive heat from the galvanized iron roofing. They indicated that such environmental factors should also manifest in the health conditions of her students, who did not present similar issues.

Consideration of Employment Conditions

However, evidence presented during the proceedings indicated that Santiago’s discomfort was likely exacerbated by her work environment, particularly due to the lack of a ceiling in her classroom. Furthermore, her active engageme

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.