Title
Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Bataan vs. Garcia, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 174964
Decision Date
Oct 5, 2016
Province of Bataan contested transfer of land titles to Bataan Polytechnic State College under R.A. No. 8562, claiming patrimonial ownership. Supreme Court upheld State ownership under Regalian Doctrine, ruling lands are public property, mandating title transfer via mandamus.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 174964)

Petitioner

Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Bataan (represented by the Governor and provincial officials).

Respondents

Congressman Enrique T. Garcia, Jr.; members of Bataan Polytechnic State College faculty; concerned students; Board of Trustees of the Bataan Polytechnic State College.

Key Dates

• Original Torrens registration of Lots 2193 and 2194: August 11, 1969.
• Enactment of R.A. No. 8562 converting Medina Lacson de Leon School and Bataan Community Colleges into Bataan Polytechnic State College: February 26, 1998.
• RTC decision granting writ of mandamus: November 29, 2002.
• CA decision affirming RTC: February 7, 2006.
• Supreme Court decision affirming CA: October 5, 2016.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (Article XII, Section 2; Article X on local autonomy)
• Republic Act No. 8562, Section 24
• Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 65 on writs of mandamus
• Regalian Doctrine and related jurisprudence (Salas v. Jarencio, Zamboanga del Norte v. City of Zamboanga)


Land Ownership Dispute and Mandamus Relief

Lots 2193 (1,222 sq m) and 2194 (10,598 sq m) in the Bataan Cadastre were issued under OCT No. N-182 to the Province of Bataan but occupied by two state-run schools. R.A. No. 8562 declared these parcels the property of the newly created Bataan Polytechnic State College (BPSC) and directed their transfer. Petitioners refused, prompting respondents to seek a writ of mandamus compelling transfer and registration in BPSC’s name.

Regulatory Background under R.A. No. 8562

Section 24 of R.A. No. 8562 states that “all parcels of land belonging to the government occupied by the Medina Lacson de Leon School of Arts and Trades and the Bataan Community Colleges are declared to be the property of the Bataan Polytechnic State College and shall be titled under that name,” with reversion to the Province if the college ceases to exist or the land is no longer needed.

Procedural History

The Regional Trial Court of Bataan granted mandamus in 2002. The Province and Sangguniang Panlalawigan appealed, arguing (1) the land was patrimonial property of the Province entitled to due process and compensation, (2) existing mortgage liens prevented free transfer, and (3) respondents lacked real-party-in-interest status. The Court of Appeals affirmed in 2006. The Supreme Court granted review and affirmed.

Contentions of the Province of Bataan

  1. The Torrens-registered lots are patrimonial properties acquired with provincial funds, hence beyond Congress’s plenary power and protected by due process and just compensation.
  2. Existing Land Bank mortgage liens violate the non-impairment clause if the titles are transferred without preserving creditor rights.
  3. Respondents lack standing, as the Province remains the true owner entitled to avails of any suit.

Court of Appeals and RTC Decisions

Both courts held:
• The Province failed to prove acquisition with private or corporate funds; under Salas v. Jarencio, municipal or provincial title to public-domain land is held in trust for the State and subject to legislative disposition.
• Mortgage liens may remain; the Land Bank’s consent and annotation of lien on the new title will preserve creditor rights.
• BPSC is the real party in interest under Section 24 of R.A. 8562 and properly impleaded.

Issues for Resolution

I. Whether the parcels are patrimonial property of the Province, requiring due process and compensation before transfer.
II. Whether mandamus can compel transfer absent compensation or due process.

Regalian Doctrine and State Ownership

Under Article XII, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution, all public-domain lands are owned by the State. The Regalian Doctrine vests absolute ownership in the State, subject to statutory grants. Title to public lands issued to local governments is presumptively held in trust for the State unless proven acquired privately.

Classification of Local Government Property

Civil Code Articles 423–424 and jurisprudence (Zamboanga del Norte) distinguish (a) public-use property, over which Congress has plenary power, from (b) patrimonial property acquired in a local government’s private capacity, protected by due process and just compensation. Public-domain lands titled to local units but not acquired with private funds remain public dominion property.

Presumption of Trust for State-held Titles

In Salas and Rabuco, the Court held that municipal lands titled without proof of private funding are communal lands held in trust for the State, subject to legislative power to reclassify and dispose of them to achieve social justice objectives. Registered title does not rebut that presumption.

Legislative Power over Communal Lands

Congress’s classification of public-domain property as disposable or public-use lies within its broad discretion and does not constitute expropriation requiring compensation, provided the property is held in trust and intended for national development or social justice programs.

Local Autonomy and Decentralization

While the 1987 Constitution (Article X, Sections 2–3) and the Local Government Code promote genuine local autonomy and devolution of powers, they do not affect the State’s dominical rights over public-domain property held in trust by local governments. Local au

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.