Title
Sangca vs. City Prosecutor of Cebu City
Case
G.R. No. 175864
Decision Date
Jun 8, 2007
Lovely Impal Adam was arrested in a 2006 buy-bust operation for alleged drug trafficking. The prosecution lacked evidence of payment, leading to her release. The Supreme Court dismissed her habeas corpus petition as moot.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 175864)

Facts of the Case

On January 4, 2007, Anisah Impal Sangca filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking the release of her daughter, Lovely Impal Adam, who was detained for allegedly violating Section 5, Article II of R.A. No. 9165. The Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) initiated a buy-bust operation on July 7, 2006, after receiving information about Adam's involvement in illegal drug trafficking in Cebu City. A team from PDEA planned and executed an entrapment operation, leading to Adam's arrest at a Pizza Hut in Fuente OsmeƱa.

Details of the Arrest

During the operation, an informant introduced Yap as a customer seeking illegal substances from Adam. Following a conversation, Adam retrieved a packet of shabu from her vehicle and handed it to Yap, who subsequently confirmed its identity and signaled the arrest team. Adam was arrested under the presumption of selling illegal drugs, and her vehicle and cell phone were confiscated. Despite being informed of her rights, Adam opted to remain silent during the proceedings.

Respondent's Defense

Adam contested the charges against her by asserting that she was not involved in drug trafficking but was instead a trader of clothing who was at Pizza Hut with her children at the time of her arrest. She described how she was misled and claimed that law enforcement officers, including Yap and Tuliao, did not explore the substance of her defense or consider her circumstances at the time of her alleged arrest.

Legal Proceedings and Findings

An inquest prosecutor initially recommended dismissing the charges against Adam, a motion later disapproved by the City Prosecutor. When the case was reviewed, Secretary Raul M. Gonzalez of the Department of Justice concluded that there was no probable cause due to the absence of evidence indicating that the officers had completed a financial transaction in the buy-bust operation. The prosecution had not established any crucial aspect of the alleged drug sale, particularly the delivery of the drug and the payment.

Court Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus

The presiding judge noted inconsistencies in the documentation from PDEA regarding the presence of buy-bust money, leading to confusion regarding the evidence provided in the court. As a result, the court ordered the information agains

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.