Title
San Miguel Brewery Inc. vs. Democratic Labor Organization
Case
G.R. No. L-18353
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1963
Union sued San Miguel Brewery over unpaid overtime, night-shift differentials, and holiday pay; Court ruled commission-based sales exempt from overtime, upheld retroactive night-shift pay, and mandated holiday compensation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-18353)

Factual Background

During the course of the hearing, the company contested the union's claims, specifically denying the material averments of the complaint. The union later narrowed its demands to focus primarily on overtime compensation, night-shift differentials, and attorney's fees. The judge rendered a decision based on the evidence presented, affirming certain claims while dismissing others.

Applicable Law and Judicial Findings

The Eight-Hour Labor Law, which regulates work hours and compensations in the Philippines, was the primary legal framework applied in this case. The court found that employees engaged in sales outside the company premises were entitled to additional compensation under this law. Specifically, the court ruled that such employees should be compensated for overtime work regardless of other allowances, with set parameters outlined for night-shift work, including differentials based on the hours worked.

Compensation Entitlements

The judge established that field employees are entitled to:

  1. 25% additional compensation for night work from 6:00 to 12:00 p.m.
  2. 75% additional compensation for work performed from 12:01 to 6:00 a.m.
  3. 25% additional compensation for work performed on Sundays and holidays as mandated by Commonwealth Act No. 444, regardless of their monthly salary agreements.

Employer's Contentions

San Miguel Brewery argued against the applicability of the Eight-Hour Labor Law for outside sales personnel, contending that these employees receive commissions that should be considered as compensation for any overtime work performed. The company used the argument that the commission-based earnings resemble a "pakiao" or piecework basis, which is exempt from the Eight-Hour Labor Law.

Court's Rationale

The court disagreed with the company’s position, emphasizing that the law applies to employees paid on a monthly or daily basis. It ruled that the commission received by outside sales personnel does not exempt them from the time provisions of the Eight-Hour Labor Law when it comes to additional compensation for work exceeding eight hours. The rationale was rooted in the nature of the employees' work and the fact that their income is closely tied to their sales performance.

Night-Shift Differential Claims

Regarding the claim for night salary differentials, the Industrial Court found that certain employees were entitled to additional compensation retroactively. However, the company contested this, asserting that the claim should not extend back prior to January 27, 1953, which the court ultimately did not accept due to prior negotiations that had acknowledged the existence of these claims.

Payment for Work on Sundays and Holidays

The court affirmed that employees, particularly security personnel, are entitled to extra remuneration for work performed on Sundays and holidays. The company argued agai

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.