Title
Salvatierra vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 144442
Decision Date
Aug 30, 2001
William Campos was stabbed by Salvatierra, Sr. after a dispute over a dog; Dominador intervened, also injured. Court upheld frustrated homicide conviction, rejecting self-defense claims and finding conspiracy.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 144442)

Criminal Complaints

The first criminal complaint (Criminal Case No. U-9275) charged Jesus Salvatierra, Sr., Jesus Salvatierra, Jr., and Alfredo Bedar with inflicting injuries on William Campos, while the second complaint (Criminal Case No. U-9276) involved Jesus Salvatierra, Sr. stabbing Dominador Campos. The injuries inflicted on William Campos included stab wounds to critical areas that could potentially lead to death, thus constituting the crime of frustrated homicide.

Summary of Prosecution Evidence

Testimony from William Campos indicated that on the night of the incident, he was walking home after work when Jesus Salvatierra, Sr. confronted him aggressively. After an exchange of words, the petitioners attacked William, restraining him while Salvatierra, Sr. stabbed him with a dagger. Dominador Campos responded to William's cries for help but was also subsequently stabbed by Salvatierra, Sr.

Defense's Position

The defense attempted to establish an alibi for Salvatierra, Sr. and claimed he acted in self-defense, citing that he and his son had been attacked by William and Dominador Campos. They asserted that William had been caught stealing ducks, which led to a physical altercation where Salvatierra, Sr. defended himself with a spading fork before using a knife.

Trial Court Decision

The Regional Trial Court found the Salvatierras guilty of frustrated homicide and sentenced them to imprisonment, specifying penalties under the Revised Penal Code. The trial court noted the gravity of the accusations and the injuries sustained by the victims, affirming that the actions of Salvatierra, Sr. and Salvatierra, Jr. amounted to a conspiracy to commit the crimes.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision with modifications to the sentencing. Jesus Salvatierra, Sr. was sentenced to an indeterminate penalty that included a reduced minimum sentence, while Salvatierra, Jr. was sentenced to a lesser term considering his young age. The appellate court also removed the civil liability awards to the complainants.

Petitioners' Allegations of Error

The petitioners challenged the Court of Appeals rulings on the grounds that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses lacked credibility and that the existence of a conspiracy was improperly determined. They contested the affirming of their conviction and sought relief from the appellate court's modifications.

Supreme Court's Affirmation of Lower Court Rulings

The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals. It highlighted the trial court's role in assessing witness credibility, which was deemed consistent and supported b

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.