Title
Saluday vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 215305
Decision Date
Apr 3, 2018
Bus passenger's bag, searched at checkpoint, contained illegal firearms and explosives; consent deemed valid, search reasonable, conviction upheld.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 215305)

Petitioner

Marcelo G. Saluday was accused of illegally possessing a high-powered firearm (.30-caliber carbine), a magazine with live ammunition, and a hand grenade found in a gray-black pack bag aboard a public bus.

Respondent

The People of the Philippines, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General, prosecuted under Presidential Decree No. 1866.

Key Dates

  • May 5, 2009: Bus flagged down and bag seized at Ilang checkpoint, Davao City.
  • May 7, 2009: City Prosecutor finds probable cause.
  • May 8, 2009: Information filed for illegal possession under PD 1866.
  • September 15, 2011: RTC conviction and sentencing.
  • June 26, 2014: Court of Appeals decision affirming conviction with modifications.
  • October 15, 2014: CA denies petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.
  • April 3, 2018: Supreme Court decision under the 1987 Constitution.

Applicable Law

  • Presidential Decree No. 1866 (illegal possession of firearms, ammunition and explosives).
  • 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article III, Section 2 (protection against unreasonable searches and seizures).

Antecedent Facts

At a military checkpoint near Tefasco Wharf, Ilang, Davao City, SCAA Buco ordered male passengers to disembark and inspected Bus No. 66. He discovered a small pack bag that a conductor identified as belonging to petitioner and his brother. Petitioner consented to open the bag, revealing:

  1. An improvised .30-caliber carbine (Serial No. 64702).
  2. One magazine with three live rounds.
  3. A “cacao”-type hand grenade.
  4. A ten-inch hunting knife.

Unable to produce a license, petitioner was arrested, informed of his rights, and charged.

Trial Proceedings and Evidence

Prosecution

  • NUP Tabura authenticated a certification confirming petitioner held no firearm licenses.
  • SCAA Buco testified to the lawful checkpoint inspection, identification of petitioner, bag ownership admission, and contents.

Defense

  • Petitioner denied ownership, attributing the bag to his late brother, but admitted telling Buco its contents were “only a cellphone” and consenting to its opening.
  • Cross-examination revealed petitioner had not volunteered his brother’s ownership and remained silent when first questioned.

RTC Decision

The Regional Trial Court found petitioner’s denials self-serving and held him in actual or constructive possession of the seized items without a license. He was sentenced to:

  • Prision mayor (minimum) and a ₱30,000 fine for illegal possession of a high-powered firearm and ammunition.
  • Prision mayor (maximum) to reclusion temporal and a ₱50,000 fine for illegal possession of explosive.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal and affirmed the conviction, with modifications:

  1. Illegal possession of firearm and ammunition: indeterminate sentence of 4 years, 8 months, 21 days to 7 years, 1 day plus ₱30,000 fine.
  2. Illegal possession of explosive: reclusion perpetua without parole eligibility plus ₱50,000 fine.

Issue

Whether the RTC and CA erred in appreciating the evidence and in admitting items seized during a warrantless search.

Supreme Court Ruling

  1. Rule 45 limits review to questions of law; factual findings affirmed by both lower courts are accorded finality.
  2. Elements of illegal possession under PD 1866—existence of the items, possession/ownership, lack of license—were proven beyond reasonable doubt.
  3. Section 2, Article III of the 1987 Constitution guards against “unreasonable” searches; reasonable searches fall outside its prohibition.
  4. Public-transport inspections involve diminished expectations of privacy. Citing jurisprudence (Katz v. United States; People v. Johnson; Dela Cruz v. People; Breis), the Court held that:
    • Checkpoint bus inspections are akin to airport

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.