Case Summary (A.M. No. P-17-3639)
Allegations Against the Respondent
Complainant Roxas asserted that Sicat and other sheriffs frequently solicited "grease money" prior to performing their duties, despite such expenses being covered by the Sheriff's Trust Fund. She highlighted instances of inefficiency wherein Sicat would report to work late and leave early, and was observed loitering during office hours. This general lack of diligence, combined with the specifics of the handling of the case against Cruz and others, formed the basis of the complaint.
Case Background and Procedural History
The core of the complaint arose from a Compromise Agreement related to a monetary obligation set at P200,539.00, which was to be paid in structured installments. Defendant Miradora Mejia, one of the obligated parties to the agreement, was identified as having failed to comply with this arrangement, prompting ROTA to seek execution of the judgment through a writ. After ROTA's motion was granted, a Writ of Execution was issued on March 12, 2012, directing Sicat to levy on the goods and chattels of the defendant.
Execution and Levy Issues
Despite the issuance of the Writ, substantial delays were noted. Sicat executed a levy on a property belonging to Renato Nunag, which was not bound by the Compromise Agreement, leading to complications. ROTA claimed that Sicat mishandled the auction of this property, issuing a Certificate of Sale at an inadequate amount of P200,539.63, despite a higher bid of P720,000.00 being submitted post-auction, thus leading to substantial financial damage for the complainant.
Investigation Findings
The executive report highlighted significant procedural lapses on Sicat's part, including the failure to submit necessary cost estimates for implementing the Writ, lack of due notices to the parties involved, and inadequate publication of the auction sale. The investigating judge concluded that these failures pointed towards gross negligence and inefficiency in fulfilling his duties as a sheriff.
Recommendations and Final Rulings
The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) ultimately determined that Sicat was guilty of gross ne
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. No. P-17-3639)
Case Overview
- Complainant: Ma. Cecilia Fermina T. Roxas, Manager and Corporate Secretary of ROTA Creditline Finance Corporation (ROTA).
- Respondent: Allen Francisco S. Sicat, Sheriff III, Office of the Clerk of Court, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Angeles City, Pampanga.
- Case Number: A.M. No. P-17-3639 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 14-4314-P).
- Date of Decision: January 23, 2018.
- Nature of Complaint: Gross inefficiency and gross misconduct of the respondent regarding the enforcement of a court judgment.
Background of the Case
- On July 17, 2014, complainant Roxas filed a letter-complaint against respondent Sicat, alleging inefficiency and misconduct in relation to Civil Case No. 10-826, where ROTA sought payment from defendants Arnold Cruz, Renato Nunag, and Miradora Mejia.
- ROTA, a financial institution, had been involved in several collection cases in the Angeles City courts, often encountering demands for "grease money" from sheriffs before they would serve court processes.
Allegations Against Respondent
- Grease Money Requests: Sheriffs allegedly solicited P1,000.00 for transportation and meal allowances, despite these expenses being covered by the Sheriff's Trust Fund.
- Inefficient Work Hours: Sheriffs were reported to arrive late and leave early, with instances of loitering during working hours.
- Delay in Execution: The respondent delayed the issuance of a Writ of Execution and the subsequent sale of the property, failing to communicate necessary information to the complainant.
Details of the Underlying Case (Civil Case No. 10-826)
- A Compromise Agreement was reached on September 30, 2010, between ROTA’s representative and defendant Mejia, stipulating a payment plan for P200,539.00.
- The agreement