Title
Romualdez vs. Sandiganbayan
Case
G.R. No. 143618-41
Decision Date
Jul 30, 2002
Benjamin Romualdez challenged charges for failing to file SALNs, arguing PCGG lacked authority to file informations. Supreme Court ruled in his favor, annulling Sandiganbayan’s orders due to invalid informations, failure to ensure proper reinvestigation, and denial of due process.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 143618-41)

Background of the Case

Prior to the current proceedings, Benjamin Romualdez had previously petitioned the Supreme Court in G.R. No. 105248 challenging the validity of twenty-four informations filed against him by the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG). These charges involved his failure to file a statement of assets and liabilities (SAL) from 1962 to 1985 while serving in government. The Sandiganbayan found the preliminary investigation spearheaded by PCGG Commissioner Augusto E. Villarin invalid due to jurisdictional issues, emphasizing that Romualdez's failure to file SALs did not relate to charges of ill-gotten wealth.

Findings of Previous Rulings

The Supreme Court held that the invalidity of the preliminary investigation did not invalidate the informations against Romualdez but directed the Sandiganbayan to pause proceedings until a proper preliminary investigation was conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman. The Sandiganbayan complied by allowing Romualdez time to respond and the prosecution time to follow up, yet Romualdez was in exile and failed to submit counter-affidavits during this period.

Developments After Petitioner’s Return

Upon returning to the Philippines in April 2000, Romualdez surrendered and engaged in the reinvestigation process initiated by Special Prosecutor Evelyn T. Lucero. However, confusion regarding legal representation and the absence of appropriate notice for hearings led to complications in his defense. A motion to quash the informations was filed but was abruptly denied by the Sandiganbayan, which set an arraignment date without granting the prosecution adequate time to respond.

Arguments and Contentions

Romualdez’s petition argued that the Sandiganbayan acted without jurisdiction by denying the motion to quash, as the PCGG Commissioner lacked authority to file the informations. He contended that his right to due process was violated due to the manner in which the case was handled, suggesting a prejudgment by the court in the proceedings.

Respondents’ Position

In response, the Sandiganbayan countered that the issue of lack of preliminary investigation was previously decided in G.R. No. 105248, asserting that it did not undermine its jurisdiction. They maintained that procedural irregularities should not invalidate the subsequent proceedings, emphasizing that the court had to consider prior decisions which dictated that the proceedings could continue despite any alleged failures in preliminary investigations.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court ruled that the informations were invalid because they were filed by an unauthorized officer, a flaw that could not

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.