Title
Roman Catholic Apostolic Administrator of Davao, Inc. vs. Land Registration Commission
Case
G.R. No. L-8451
Decision Date
Dec 20, 1957
A corporation sole with an alien incumbent was denied land registration due to constitutional restrictions requiring 60% Filipino ownership and control.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-8451)

Issues

  1. Whether a corporation sole with a non-Filipino incumbent is qualified under the 1935 Constitution to acquire private agricultural lands.
  2. Whether the constitutional requirement that 60 percent of a corporation’s capital be Filipino-owned applies to a corporation sole, and, if so, how it is satisfied.

Constitutional Provisions on Land Acquisition

  • Section 1, Article XIII: Natural resources and disposition limited to Filipino citizens or corporations with at least 60 percent Filipino capital, “subject to any existing right, grant, lease or concession at the time of the inauguration of the Government established under this Constitution.”
  • Section 5, Article XIII: No private agricultural land may be transferred except to individuals, corporations, or associations qualified to acquire or hold lands of the public domain.

Corporate Sole under Philippine Law

  • Section 154, Corp. Law: Bishop or presiding elder may become a corporation sole to manage church temporalities.
  • Section 155: Articles of incorporation required, affirming the administrator’s charge over church estates.
  • Section 157: Upon filing, temporalities are held in trust by the corporation sole for church benefit.
  • Section 159: Corporation sole may purchase and hold real and personal property for church, charitable, benevolent, and educational purposes, and receive bequests or gifts; court leave required to mortgage or sell unless church discipline provides otherwise.
  • Section 163: Temporalities administered by the corporation sole are held in trust for the use, purpose, and benefit of the church of which the diocese or district is a part.

Ownership and Control of Church Properties

The Court recognized that church temporalities are owned by the church as a “moral person” or by dioceses as minor moral persons, with the bishop or ordinary serving only as administrator. Title acquired by a corporation sole passes by operation of law to its successor in office, ensuring continuity of administration. Ownership vests in the church itself; the corporation sole has no proprietary interest beyond its trust function.

Constitutional Interpretation and Application

  • The Constitution’s nationality and natural-resources provisions were aimed at preventing foreign exploitation of undeveloped natural wealth and did not contemplate the special form of religious corporations sole.
  • Corporations sole have no nationality; their capacity to acquire real property under pre-Constitution statutes was not intended to be curtailed.
  • The saving clause in Section 1 preserves “existing rights” as of governmental inauguration, including the corporate power to acquire ecclesiastical properties.
  • A purposive and liberal construction of the Constitution guards against absurd or unjust results—namely, denying church entities lands needed for places of worship, education, health, and burial.

Court’s Holding

By majority, the Supreme Court held that:

  • The petitioner, as a corporation sole, is constitutionally qualified to acquire and register private agricultural lands despite its incumbent’s foreign citizenship.
  • Sections 1 and 5 of Article XIII do not apply to corporations sole, which hold lands in trust for Filipino faithful wi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.