Title
Rivera vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 47757
Decision Date
Apr 17, 1942
Ana Rivera claimed joint bank account funds after Edgar Stephenson's death under a survivorship agreement. The Supreme Court ruled it a valid aleatory contract, awarding her the balance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 47757)

Relevant Facts

Ana Rivera worked as a housekeeper for Edgar Stephenson from 1920 until his death on June 8, 1939. The significant transactions include the opening of a bank account by Stephenson on December 24, 1929, with an initial deposit of P1,000. This account, originally held in his name only, underwent a transformation through a survivorship agreement executed on October 17, 1931, when the balance was P2,072. The agreement stipulated joint ownership of the funds deposited with the Peoples Bank, explicitly indicating that upon the death of either party, the remaining balance would belong to the survivor.

Dispute Over Ownership

Following Edgar Stephenson's death, Ana Rivera, holding the deposit book, claimed a balance of P701.43 from the bank. However, the bank, upon receiving legal advice, declined to pay her, citing doubts regarding the validity of the survivorship agreement. Consequently, Rivera initiated legal action against the bank, while Minnie Stephenson intervened, asserting that the funds were solely the property of the deceased.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court concluded that the survivorship agreement functioned merely as a power of attorney allowing Ana Rivera to withdraw funds during Stephenson's life, which would have lapsed upon his death. Furthermore, the trial court characterized the agreement as a donation mortis causa, necessitating compliance with the formalities required for testamentary dispositions per Article 620 of the Civil Code. Hence, it declared the agreement devoid of legal effect due to non-compliance with these formalities.

Review and Conclusions on the Survivorship Agreement

The court's interpretation of the survivorship agreement as merely a power of attorney or as a donation mortis causa was contested. The ruling relied on the assumption that Stephenson retained exclusive ownership over the funds by virtue of the account being initially registered solely in his name. It is important to note that, in banking arrangements, a person often deposits funds in another individual's name without ceding ownership rights.

The appellate court found that the survivorship agreement established joint ownership of the funds. The agreement allowed either party to withdraw the entire amount during their lifetime and secured the remaining balance for the survivor upon one party's death. This legal arrangement aligns with the principles of aleatory contracts as stated in Article 1790 of the Civil Code, which governs agreements based on uncertain economic outcomes. Citing previous jurisprudence, the court validated the notion that joint ownership accounts with survivorship rights are acceptable so long as they are not

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.