Title
Supreme Court
Rigon, Jr. vs. Subia
Case
A.C. No. 10249
Decision Date
Sep 7, 2020
Atty. Subia found guilty of notarizing a fraudulent deed involving deceased individuals, violating Notarial Rules, resulting in suspension and disqualification.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 10249)

Allegations Against Atty. Eric P. Subia

Virgilio Jr. alleged that Atty. Subia improperly notarized a Deed of Absolute Sale executed on June 24, 2011, despite knowing that the signatories, Placido and Telesfora, had passed away long before this date. The complaint stated that the notarized deed facilitated the transfer of land ownership to an individual named Pete Gerald L. Javier, which the heirs contested as fraudulent due to the notarization of deceased individuals.

Respondent's Defense

In response, Atty. Subia denied any wrongdoing, claiming that he did not prepare the disputed document and that his signature was forged. He exhibited a certification from the Office of the Clerk of Court in Cauayan confirming that another document, not the disputed deed, was recorded under the same docket number.

Proceedings Initiated by the IBP

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) received the case for investigation after the Supreme Court referred it. Following an initial review and the unfortunate death of the complainant due to a gunshot wound, Atty. Subia filed a motion arguing for dismissal based on the complainant's death and the alleged invalidity of the Special Power of Attorney (SPA) utilized by the complainant’s father.

Findings of the IBP

The IBP found Atty. Subia liable for violations of the Notarial Rules, noting that he showed negligence by not ensuring the identities of the signatories were verified. Their report emphasized that Atty. Subia's undenied presence of his notarial seal and signature on the deed signified accountability, despite his claims of forgery.

Court Ruling on Proceedings

The Court determined that the death of the complainant did not halt the disciplinary proceedings, emphasizing the sui generis nature of such actions aimed at upholding the integrity of the legal profession. The Court also ruled that Virgilio Sr. could not substitute his son in the complaint due to the stipulations regarding the SPA.

Violation of Notarial Rules

The Court affirmed the IBP’s conclusions regarding Atty. Subia’s negligence in executing his duties as a notary public. Specific sections of the Notarial Rules

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.