Title
Supreme Court
Ricasata vs. Cargo Safeway, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 208896-97
Decision Date
Apr 6, 2016
Seafarer Ricasata, denied medical check-ups, suffered severe hearing loss. Claimed disability benefits but failed mandatory reporting. Awarded unearned wages, leave pay, attorney's fees; denied disability benefits.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 208896-97)

Antecedent Facts

Ricasata's work involved operating in a noisy environment leading to severe ear pain, which he reported but which was not medically attended to. After being replaced on March 19, 2010, he underwent an audiogram revealing severe hearing loss and was subsequently diagnosed with permanent medical unfitness. He filed an action for disability benefits and related claims on July 21, 2010. The respondents contested the claims, citing failure to report any illness or injury following the termination of his contract.

The Decision of the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators

The Panel ruled in favor of Ricasata, determining he was entitled to sickness allowance and disability benefits due to his significant hearing loss resulting from his work. The Panel rejected respondents' assertions regarding the expiration of Ricasata's contract and awarded him $51,000 as disability benefits, plus a sickness allowance for the unserved contract portion.

The Decision of the Court of Appeals

Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals addressed Ricasata’s claim for increased benefits against Cargo Safeway and Evergreen Marine’s position for reversal of the arbitrators' decision. The court emphasized that disability benefits hinge not only on medical findings but also on compliance with established procedural requirements, including notification and examination by a company-designated physician. The court ultimately sided with the respondents regarding the non-completion of the employment contract, allowing Ricasata his unearned wages but denying his claims for disability benefits.

The Issues

Two central issues arose: whether Ricasata fulfilled his employment contract and whether he is entitled to disability benefits and attorney's fees.

Ruling of the Court

The court found that Ricasata did not complete his contract, confirming that his early termination did not fall within the flexible provisions of the CBA and rejecting the proposition that he forfeited his rights to unearned wages. It reinforced that without timely reporting to a designated physician, he could not substantiate his claims for disability benefits or sickness allowance. Nonetheless, the court affirmed his entitlement to unearned wages and leave pay.

Monetary Entitlement and Attorney’s Fees

The court determined Ricasata was entitled to his earned wages and leave pay without any claims for additional b

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.