Title
Supreme Court
Reyes vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 232678
Decision Date
Jul 3, 2019
Husband, a pilot, ceased financial support to ailing wife, causing emotional anguish; convicted under R.A. No. 9262 for psychological violence and economic abuse.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 232678)

Petitioner

Esteban Donato Reyes, accused of economic and psychological violence under R.A. No. 9262 for withdrawing financial support from his wife, AAA, beginning July 2005.

Respondent

People of the Philippines, prosecuting the alleged violation of Section 5(i) of Republic Act No. 9262 (Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004).

Key Dates

• June 5, 2006 – Information filed for violation of Section 5(e), par. 2, R.A. No. 9262.
• March 12, 2007 – Temporary Protection Order (TPO) directing support of ₱20,000/month.
• August 30, 2007 – Hold Departure Order issued against Reyes.
• October 28, 2008 – TPO made permanent.
• March 3, 2016 – RTC conviction under Section 5(i).
• June 23, 2017 – CA affirmed RTC decision.
• July 3, 2019 – Supreme Court decision.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (due process, right to information).
• Republic Act No. 9262, Sections 3(c), 5(e)(2), 5(i), and Section 6(f) on penalties.
• Rule 110, Section 6 of the Rules of Court on sufficiency of Information.
• Indeterminate Sentence Law (Art. 64, RPC).

Procedural History

The RTC denied Reyes’s motion to quash, found him guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Section 5(i) RA 9262, and sentenced him to 3 years prision correccional to 8 years and 1 day prision mayor. The CA dismissed his appeal. Reyes filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court.

Facts

Reyes and AAA married in 1969 and had four children. Beginning July 2005, while assigned abroad, Reyes ceased remitting ₱10,000–₱20,000 monthly support. AAA’s health deteriorated, prompting her to seek relief under R.A. No. 9262. Reyes claimed the marriage was void and support terminated out of “ingratitude.”

Issues

  1. Whether the June 5, 2006 Information sufficiently alleged the elements of Section 5(i).
  2. Whether Reyes’s marital relationship and corresponding support obligation were valid.
  3. Whether deprivation of financial support constitutes psychological violence under Section 5(i) or economic abuse under Section 5(e)(2).

Legal Analysis

– Under Rule 110, Sec. 6, an Information must state the accused’s name, statutory designation of the offense, acts or omissions, offended party, date, and place. The Information alleged abandonment without support, causing psychological and emotional suffering, meeting Section 5(i) elements.
– Section 5(i) requires (a) the offended party be a spouse or person with a sexual relationship; (b) mental or emotional anguish; and (c) anguish resulting from denial of financial support or similar acts. These elements were adequately pleaded.
– The certified marriage contract is admissible best evidence establishing Reyes’s marital status and his legal duty to support. A marriage is valid until judicially annulled. Even absent a valid marriage, RA 9262 covers persons with whom the offender has a common child. AAA bore Reyes four children.
– Deprivation of support also constitutes economic abuse under Section 5(e)(2), which penalizes depriving a

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.