Title
Reyes vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 39537
Decision Date
Mar 19, 1985
Dispute over land ownership in Quezon and Batangas; Irene Delgado claimed inheritance as Francisco Delgado’s illegitimate child, but SC ruled insufficient proof of recognition, denying her rights and reconveyance to respondents.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 204232)

Factual Background

On January 29, 1967, the private respondents filed a complaint against Irene Reyes and her husband Moises Villanueva in the Court of First Instance of Batangas. The complaint sought a deed of reconveyance for various properties that were wrongfully registered in Irene's name based on allegations of fraud and misrepresentation. The plaintiffs claimed they were the rightful heirs of Francisco Delgado, arguing that Irene Reyes was not his legitimate daughter. The complaint asserted that Irene had exploited her relationship with Genoveva Ramero (her mother) to assert ownership over the properties without just cause.

Legal Proceedings

Irene Reyes filed an answer asserting her legitimacy as the child of Francisco Delgado, claiming she was his illegitimate daughter and had lived with him throughout his life. She counterclaimed for her share in her father's inheritance. The trial court dismissed the case in a ruling on December 26, 1969, finding Irene to be the lawful owner of the properties in question while dismissing her counterclaim for lack of evidence.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The decision of the Court of First Instance was appealed, leading to a ruling by the Court of Appeals on October 7, 1974, which reversed the lower court's decision. The appellate court declared the deed of self-adjudication executed by Irene to be null and void, reinstating the original titles in the name of Francisco Delgado. The Court found that while Irene was indeed born of Francisco Delgado and Genoveva Ramero during their relationship, there was no formal acknowledgment of her as an illegitimate child, thereby precluding any inheritance rights under Philippine law.

Supreme Court Review

Subsequent to the adverse ruling from the Court of Appeals, the petitioners sought to reverse the decision through a petition for review. In further arguments presented, petitioners contended the established principles governing succession and the recognition of illegitimate children necessary for asserting such rights. The Supreme Court evaluated the claims, reaffirming the long-held doctrine that illegitimate children must be recognized in order to inherit from their parents, drawing from relevant jurisprudence.

Legal Doctrines Applied

The ruling emphasized key doctrines from the Civil Code regarding inheritance rights of illegitimate children, particularly Articles 278 and 283, which mandate recognition as a prere

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.