Title
Reyes vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 120905
Decision Date
Mar 7, 1996
Mayor Reyes removed for extortion, misappropriation; disqualified from reelection despite winning; second placer denied victory.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 120905)

Petitioner and Respondent

Renato U. Reyes is the petitioner in G.R. No. 120905, contesting his disqualification from local office and the cancellation of his certificate of candidacy. Julius O. Garcia, the petitioner in G.R. No. 120940, seeks to be proclaimed the elected mayor of Bongabong, arguing for his eligibility following Reyes's disqualification.

Key Dates

  • May 11, 1992: Reyes was elected mayor.
  • October 26, 1994: An administrative complaint was filed against Reyes.
  • February 6, 1995: Reyes was found guilty by the Sangguniang Panlalawigan.
  • March 8, 1995: Reyes filed his certificate of candidacy for reelection.
  • May 8, 1995: Elections took place.
  • May 9, 1995: COMELEC issued a resolution disqualifying Reyes.
  • July 3, 1995: COMELEC en banc denied Reyes's motion for reconsideration.

Applicable Law

The case concerned the interpretation of the Local Government Code of 1991 (R.A. No. 7160), particularly Section 40(b), which disqualifies individuals removed from office as a result of an administrative case from running for elective local positions.

Procedural Background

Reyes's administrative issues stemmed from allegations concerning misconduct, including financial irregularities and misappropriation. An administrative complaint culminated in a resolution for his removal from office. Despite this resolution, Reyes filed a certificate of candidacy for the May 1995 elections, leading to contested legal proceedings when COMELEC declared him disqualified based on the earlier administrative decision.

Service of Decision and Finality

Reyes contended that he had not received the Sangguniang Panlalawigan's decision, asserting that the decision was not final. However, evidence indicated that attempts were made to serve the decision, which he and his counsel refused to accept. The court found that service was valid as per civil procedure rules, concluding that the decision became final 30 days subsequent to the service attempts despite Reyes’s non-acceptance.

Reelection and Disqualification

Reyes argued that his reelection barred his disqualification, citing Aguinaldo v. Santos, which held that a public official could not be removed for misconduct committed during a prior term if reelected. The court, however, distinguished this case, referencing that Reyes’s administrative decision became final before the elections, thus validating his disqualification.

Garcia's Petition

Julius O. Garcia, having secured the second-highest votes, sought to be declared the elected mayor following Reyes's disqualification. The court re

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.