Title
Reyes-Talag vs. Register of Deeds of Laguna
Case
G.R. No. L-25475
Decision Date
Mar 29, 1968
Government expropriated land, excluding 471 sqm sold to Felicidad Reyes-Talag. Supreme Court ruled her ownership valid, ordering new title issuance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-25475)

Expropriation and Judicial Proceedings

On June 23, 1959, the Court of First Instance of Laguna confirmed the government's right to expropriate the land, with the exception of two lots—one comprising 471 square meters that had been sold to Felicidad Reyes-Talag and another of 1,170 square meters sold to Jose Oliver. The court's decision was recorded as Entry No. 26592 on the back of the original title and conveyed the exclusion of these lots from expropriation. Subsequently, upon surveying her portion of the land, Reyes-Talag sought a new title reflecting her ownership but encountered obstacles from the Register of Deeds.

Challenges Faced by the Petitioner

The Acting Register of Deeds required a certificate of title for the entire land before issuing a new certificate for the segregated portion. Reyes-Talag complied by providing the original title and a subsequent confirmation from Numeriano Reyes regarding the transfer of the 471 square meters. Following Numeriano Reyes' death on August 8, 1962, further documentation was demanded, including a death certificate and a deed confirming the transfer executed by Numeriano's heirs, which included both minor and adult children.

Court of First Instance's Denial

Despite fulfilling these requirements, the Acting Register of Deeds still refused to issue the new certificate, leading Reyes-Talag to petition the Court of First Instance of Laguna on January 7, 1965, seeking an order for the issuance of a new title. The Acting Register contended that the decision from the expropriation case did not authorize the issuance of a new certificate and maintained that Reyes-Talag should have presented her case to the Land Registration Commission per Republic Act No. 1151.

Lower Court's Findings and Petitioner's Appeal

The Court of First Instance denied the petition, reasoning that the expropriation judgment failed to explicitly recognize Reyes-Talag's ownership. It claimed that the acknowledgment of transfer by Numeriano Reyes was merely a private document and did not constitute a formal deed of conveyance. Consequently, Reyes-Talag asserted a motion for reconsideration, which was also denied. Subsequently, she appealed to a higher court, questioning the legality and grounds of the lower court's refusal.

Analysis of Ownership and Title Issuance

Critical to the case is the acknowledgment that Numeriano Reyes had indeed affirmed the transfer of ownership to Felicidad Reyes-Talag through a public instrument. Furthermore, the absence of dissent from the heirs, who later executed a Deed of Confirmation, underscored the recognition of Reyes-Talag's ownership and the desire to facilitate the issuance of the title. The appellate court noted that the expropriation decision had expressly excluded the 471 square meters from the expropriated area, thereby confirming Reyes-Talag's claim.

Justification for Title Issuance

The appellate court highlighted that, notwithstanding the lower court's interp

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.