Title
Rey vs. Anson
Case
G.R. No. 211206
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2018
Rosemarie Rey borrowed funds secured by mortgages, contested excessive interest rates, and overpaid loans. SC ruled excessive rates unconscionable, ordered return of excess payments, and applied legal interest.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 211206)

Relevant Date and Jurisdiction

This case reached the Supreme Court, with the decision rendered on November 7, 2018, which indicates that the provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution are applicable.

Factual Background

In August 2002, Rosemarie Rey borrowed two substantial amounts from Cesar Anson, totaling P200,000 and P350,000, respectively. The first loan carried a monthly interest rate of 7.5%, while the second loan had a rate of 7%. Both loans were secured by real estate mortgages on properties owned by the Reys or related parties. Over time, Rey experienced difficulty in repaying these loans as scheduled and requested extensions of payment terms, which were granted by Anson through subsequent legal agreements. Despite partial payments on the loans, Rey later argued that the interest rates imposed were excessive and unconscionable.

Lower Court Proceedings

Initially, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled in favor of Rey, determining that the interest rates agreed upon in the loans were unconscionable, declaring them void, and replacing them with the legal interest rate of 12% per annum. The RTC ordered Anson to return an overpayment amounting to approximately P143,688. This ruling was contested by both parties.

Decision of the Court of Appeals

On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the RTC’s decision, ruling that the stipulated interest rates were valid due to the suspension of the Usury Law, which allowed parties greater freedom in contracting terms. It upheld the validity of the 7.5% and 7% monthly interest rates, ordering Rey to pay a total of P902,847.87, with applicable interest, derived from the complexities of compensating the amounts owed and overpaid across the separate loan agreements.

Key Issues Raised in the Supreme Court

Rey raised several points of contention on appeal to the Supreme Court: firstly, whether the interest rates stipulated in the loan contracts were indeed unconscionable, and thus, should be revised to the legal rate; secondly, whether the RTC had made errors in its handling of the recomputation of payments and the resulting overpayments; and thirdly, whether Rey was entitled to recover attorney's fees and expenses associated with the litigation.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the fundamental principle from Article 1306 of the Civil Code, emphasizing that while parties can stipulate interest rates freely, such stipulations must not be contrary to morals, public policy, or law. The Court found that the imposed rates of 7.5% and 7% were excessively high and declared them void. In contrast, it upheld the lower court’s decision that structured interest payments on the initial loans based on the applicable legal interest rate of 12%.

The ruling further recognized that Rey had made excessive payments on the loans,

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.