Title
Republic vs. Sogod Development Corporation
Case
G.R. No. 175760
Decision Date
Feb 17, 2016
Sogod Development Corp. sought land title registration, claiming possession since 1945. SC upheld its claim, ruling private corporations can register alienable land if converted to private property through possession.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 175760)

Background of the Case

On December 9, 1999, Sogod Development Corporation filed an application for the judicial confirmation of title over Lot No. 2533 with an area of approximately 23,896 square meters. The Respondent claimed ownership of this land, asserting that it had been in open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession since June 12, 1945. The application was contested by the Office of the Solicitor General, which argued that the land was not alienable and disposable until January 17, 1986, and consequently, Sogod was disqualified from claiming title under Article XII, Section 3 of the 1987 Constitution.

Court Proceedings

The Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Catmon-Carmen-Sogod, Cebu, rendered a Decision on May 10, 2001, granting Sogod's application for registration. This decision was later affirmed by the Court of Appeals, which concluded that Sogod had sufficiently proven its continuous possession of the land since the required date. The Office of the Solicitor General subsequently filed an appeal, arguing several points of error related to the sufficiency of evidence and the nature of the land.

Legal Issues Raised

The primary legal issues presented to the Supreme Court included whether prior possession of forest land could count towards the required period for judicial confirmation of title and whether Sogod and its predecessors had possessed the property in the required manner since June 12, 1945. The Petitioner contended that any possession before the land's classification as alienable was legally irrelevant. Moreover, it also questioned Sogod's evidence of possession, particularly the timing of tax declarations and the validity of documents proving ownership.

Court's Findings on Possession and Ownership

The Supreme Court reiterated that Section 48(b) of Commonwealth Act No. 141 requires that applicants demonstrate open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession of alienable and disposable lands under a bona fide claim since June 12, 1945. The Court clarified that the classification of land as alienable and disposable only needed to occur by the time of the registration application, not retroactively to the period of possession.

The Court emphasized that possession could be established through a chain of ownership evidenced by tax declarations and testimonies, including the uninterrupted possession since 1945 and the cultivation of the land. Despite the Petitioner’s challenges regarding the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.