Case Summary (G.R. No. 206316)
Facts of the Case
On October 20, 1999, Winston T. Singun expressed his intention to apply for a leave of absence and signified his intention to retire on August 1, 2000. After his application was denied, he later filed for both a leave of absence and a resignation, which was subsequently accepted by Regional Director Jose Hipolito. However, on January 17, 2000, Singun communicated his decision to withdraw his resignation, highlighting that he felt pressured to resign under duress.
Rulings by the Civil Service Commission
The Civil Service Commission (CSC) issued Resolution No. 002651 on November 27, 2000, declaring Singun's resignation as inoperative and ordered the payment of his salaries retroactive to January 1, 2000. The CSC determined that the acceptance of Singun's resignation was invalid due to a lack of notification, which rendered any acceptance ineffective. The CSC’s conclusion was that insufficient evidence existed to demonstrate that Singun was informed about the acceptance of his resignation.
Appeal to the Court of Appeals
Following the CSC's decision, the DTI filed a motion for reconsideration which was subsequently denied in Resolution No. 010843. The DTI's subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeals was also denied; it upheld the CSC’s findings, indicating that there was substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that Singun's resignation was ineffectual. The Court emphasized that an effective resignation must involve clear intent and notification, which were not adequately satisfied in this scenario.
Legal Analysis of Resignation and Acceptance
The core of the legal issue revolves around the requirements for a valid resignation in the public sector. The acceptance of a resignation must be duly communicated for it to be operative. The failure to notify Singun of the acceptance of his resignation meant he had not legally relinquished his position. The Court of Appeals supported the notion that the resignation could be withdrawn prior to acceptance, thus confirming that Singun remained in his position after submitt
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 206316)
The Case
- This case stems from a petition for review on certiorari regarding the 1 August 2001 Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 64953.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed Civil Service Commission (CSC) Resolution Nos. 002651 and 010843, which addressed the validity of respondent Winston T. Singun's resignation from the Department of Trade and Industry, Regional Office No. 2 (DTI-RO2).
- CSC Resolution No. 002651 declared that Singun's resignation was inoperative and ordered the payment of his salaries and benefits from 1 January 2000.
- CSC Resolution No. 010843 denied the petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.
The Facts
- The Republic of the Philippines, represented by DTI-RO2, is the petitioner in this case, while Winston T. Singun is the respondent.
- Singun served as the Chief Trade and Industry Development Specialist at DTI-RO2 in Cagayan Province.
- On 20 October 1999, Singun expressed his intention to take a leave of absence from 16 November 1999 to 31 July 2000 and to retire on 1 August 2000.
- His request for leave and early retirement was denied by Regional Director Jose Hipolito.
- Subsequently, on 8 November 1999, Singun submitted an application for leave and resignation, which was endorsed to Assistant Secretary Zenaida C. Maglaya for comment.
- Singun filed another application for a shorter leave of absence from 16 November 1999 to 14 January 2000, coupled with a resignation effective at the close of office hours on 14 January 2000.
- Director Hipolito approved this application and notified Atty. Soria of the CSC-RO2