Title
Republic vs. Heirs of Angeles
Case
G.R. No. 141296
Decision Date
Oct 7, 2002
The State sought reversion of land fraudulently acquired via free patent; SC ruled prescription does not apply, allowing recovery of public land.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 141296)

Relevant Background

The case originates from a complaint filed by the DENR for the reversion of Lot No. 2744, Cadastral 241, Orion Cadastre, located in Capunitan, Orion, Bataan. The lot, once owned by the deceased Agustin L. Angeles, was acquired through a free patent issued on February 24, 1964. A significant issue arose from the illegal postdating of a Deed of Absolute Sale for part of the property, executed after Angeles' death, which aimed to circumvent restrictions on the alienation of free patent lands within five years.

Procedural History

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Balanga, Bataan, dismissed the DENR’s complaint for reversion on September 7, 1999. The court determined that the state’s cause of action had prescribed since the complaint was filed more than thirty-four years after the issuance of the original title, and additionally ruled that the respondent Alvarez was an innocent purchaser for value.

Issues for Resolution

The primary issue addressed by the Supreme Court was whether the trial court erred in dismissing the petitioner's complaint on the ground of prescription, ultimately questioning if prescription runs against the State.

Court's Reasoning

The Court determined that the doctrine of laches and prescription does not apply to the State when it seeks to recover its properties that were obtained through fraudulent means. The Court criticized the RTC's reliance on the case of Esconde v. Barlongay, asserting that it was inapplicable to the current situation since that case dealt with an individual’s action for reconveyance, and not the State’s right to recover public land.

The Court affirmed that titles secured through fraud should not be immune to re-examination by the State, emphasizing that one who acquires property unlawfully should not benefit from their actions. Furthermore, contrary to the lower court's ruling, the Court reiterated that public

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.