Title
Republic vs. Harp
Case
G.R. No. 188829
Decision Date
Jun 13, 2016
Davonn Harp, a U.S.-born basketball player recognized as a Filipino citizen, faced deportation after Senate findings questioned his citizenship. The Supreme Court upheld his citizenship, ruling the DOJ and BI lacked sufficient evidence and violated due process in revoking it.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 162059)

Background Facts

Respondent Davonn Maurice Harp, born on January 21, 1977, in the United States, was invited to play in the Philippine Basketball Association, which led to a Senate investigation into the citizenship of foreign basketball players in the Philippines. During the inquiry, doubts about his Philippine citizenship arose concerning the authenticity of his documentation, primarily a birth certificate of his father, Manuel Arce Gonzalez.

Senate Inquiry Findings

The Senate Committees discovered that documents submitted by Harp to support his citizenship claim were likely falsified. The investigation revealed discrepancies in the birth certificate of Manuel, as well as issues related to documentation about his grandparents and the lack of public records. Specifically, alterations to the birth certificate raised significant concerns regarding its authenticity.

Actions Taken by the DOJ

In response to the Senate's findings, the Department of Justice (DOJ) established a special committee to investigate the citizenship of Harp and other players. On October 18, 2004, the DOJ issued a resolution revoking Harp's recognition as a Philippine citizen, prompting the Bureau of Immigration to initiate summary deportation proceedings.

Summary Deportation Order Issued

On October 26, 2004, the Bureau of Immigration issued a Summary Deportation Order concerning Harp. Following this, Harp sought judicial intervention and initially filed a Petition for Prohibition with the Regional Trial Court, which he later withdrew, opting to file a Petition for Review with the Court of Appeals (CA) instead.

Court of Appeals Decision

In a decision dated July 16, 2009, the CA granted Harp's petition, nullifying the Summary Deportation Order. The CA determined that Harp, who had been recognized as a Filipino citizen, could not be summarily deported without due process. It emphasized the necessity for a proper legal challenge to any claim against his citizenship rather than an indirect attack through deportation proceedings.

Petitioners' Arguments

The petitioners contended that the CA erred in its decision, arguing that Harp's appeal was moot due to his voluntary departure from the Philippines, that the appeal was filed late, and that the CA improperly relied on Harp's citizenship as a basis for its ruling.

Respondent's Claims

Harp asserted that he was a recognized natural-born citizen of the Philippines and challenged the revocation of his citizenship based on the alleged misrepresentation and spurious documentation claims made by the Senate committees, DOJ, and Bureau of Immigration.

Resolution of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled against the petitioners' claims, determining that Harp's case was not moot because he had demonstrated an intent to return to the Philippines and was actively fighting for his recognized citizenship. The Court further ruled that there were no undue delays in Harp's appeal process, deeming the one-day delay in filing excusabl

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.