Title
Supreme Court
Republic vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 108926
Decision Date
Jul 12, 1996
Democrito O. Plaza's ownership claim upheld; proven possession since 1945 via tax records, deeds, despite oppositions and Proclamation No. 679.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 108926)

Applicable Law

The legal principles governing this case are primarily drawn from the 1987 Philippine Constitution and pertinent land registration laws, notably Presidential Decree No. 1529, which governs the registration of land titles in the Philippines.

Factual Background

The subject property measures 45,295 square meters and originally belonged to Santos de la Cruz, who declared ownership through several tax declarations from 1913 to 1921. Successive owners included Pedro Cristobal, Regino Gervacio, Diego Calugdan, and Gil Alhambra. An extrajudicial partition occurred following Alhambra's death, leading to a "Deed of Sale With Mortgage" executed on July 5, 1966, transferring ownership to the petitioner. Once the mortgage was released, the petitioner paid property taxes and declared the property in his name until 1986, when he filed a petition for registration of title.

Proceedings and Oppositions

The petition filed by the Republic of the Philippines alleged that the petitioner failed to demonstrate the necessary continuous possession required to establish ownership, opposing the claim based on tax declarations and earlier failed ownership claims. Several other oppositors also entered the proceedings, claiming rights to the property through historical titles and traditional possession.

Trial Court Decision

On June 14, 1991, the trial court ruled in favor of the petitioner, affirming his ownership based on evidence of continuous and notorious possession backed by tax declarations, indicating ownership for more than thirty years prior to June 12, 1945. The trial court's decision was rooted in the interpretation of possession in the concept of ownership, referring to the relevant tax records and witness testimonies.

Appeal and Court of Appeals Decision

The Republic appealed the trial court's decision asserting that the evidence presented was insufficient to support ownership claims. However, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's ruling on February 8, 1993, agreeing that the petitioner's tax declarations and receipts constituted sufficient proof of continuous ownership and possession. The court found that the property had been transformed into a rice field, demonstrating actual possession, and rejected the opposing claims stating they lacked legal grounds.

Supreme Court Findings and Rulings

The Supreme Court rejected the Republic's petition, affirming the Court of Appeals' conclusion that the petitioner had proven ownership through legitimate claims of possession. The Court highlighted that merely withdrawing pr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.