Title
Re: Organizational Structure and Administrative Set-up of the Philippine Judicial Academy
Case
A.M. No. 01-1-04-SC-PHILJA
Decision Date
Sep 25, 2009
PHILJA requested staffing amendments, converting positions to coterminous for trust-based roles, retaining permanent roles for continuity; Supreme Court approved with modifications.

Case Summary (A.M. No. 01-1-04-SC-PHILJA)

Request for Approval of Staffing Changes

Justice Azcuna's letter referenced a prior Court En Banc Resolution from September 23, 2008, that approved the existing staffing pattern of PHILJA. He proposed two key amendments: firstly, converting the position of PHILJA Attorney VI to Judicial Staff Head, while keeping the salary grade intact; secondly, reverting the status of specific positions from permanent to coterminous (temporary), which would provide the Chancellor the authority to appoint staff based on trust and confidence when necessary.

Administrative Recommendations

Following Justice Azcuna’s request, the Court directed the Office of Administrative Services to provide comments, resulting in a comprehensive memorandum from Atty. Eden T. Candelaria dated July 22, 2009. This memorandum analyzed Azcuna's proposal and made recommendations regarding the requested conversions and changes in staffing status. Notably, Candelaria pointed out that the Judicial Staff Head position is typically aligned with Justices' offices and recommended instead a reclassification of the PHILJA Attorney VI as the Head Executive Assistant to maintain the salary grade.

Analysis of Staffing Structure

A detailed review of the plantilla of the Office of the Chancellor revealed that certain positions, while initially classified as permanent, warranted a shift back to coterminous due to the nature of the work and the Chancellor's need for a trusted staff. Candelaria suggested the retention of the Records Officer II as permanent for continuity in record management. Additionally, similar adjustments were suggested for the Offices of the Vice-Chancellor and Executive Secretary, involving the conversion of positions to coterminous status.

Compliance and Joint Agreement

On August 12, 2009, Justice Azcuna communicated his agreement to the recommendations pertaining to his office while requesting a delay on changes proposed for the Vice-Chancellor and Executive Secretary’s offices until their respective terms concluded. This prompted another Court directive on August 18, 2009, requiring comments from the aforementioned offices regarding the proposed staffing changes.

Support from Vice-Chancellor and Executive Secretary

The response generated on August 27, 2009, included a joint letter from the PHILJA Vice-Chancellor, Justice Justo P. Torres, the Executive Secretary, Justice Marina L. Buzon, and Administrative Chief, Judge Thelma A. Ponferrada. They aligned with Azcuna's position and requested adherence to Candelaria’s recommendations concerning staffing provisions.

Court's Resolution

The Court granted Azcuna's request for the staff changes, determining that the reclassification recommended by Atty. Candelaria was meritorious. Consequently, certain positions in the Office of the Chancellor

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.