Case Summary (A.M. No. RTJ-04-1868)
Petitioner’s Request
In a letter dated May 26, 2004, addressed to Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide, Jr., Judge Gustilo requests that the second tranche of the Special Allowance for Judges, as stipulated under Republic Act No. 9227, be included in the computation of his retirement benefits. This second tranche is scheduled for implementation on November 11, 2004, and the Judge argues that, given his retirement is only a month prior, it should be counted in his final benefits.
Legal Framework
Republic Act No. 9227, which took effect on November 11, 2003, provides additional compensation to the judiciary. Specifically, Section 2 mandates the grant of special allowances equivalent to 100% of the basic salary, implemented uniformly over four years in tranches of 25%. Section 5 explicitly states that only allowances actually received at retirement are to be included in the computation of retirement benefits.
Relevant Guidelines
The Court, on March 9, 2004, promulgated guidelines regarding the implementation of these allowances. It indicates that only allowances that have accrued by the time of retirement will be included in benefits computation, emphasizing uniformity in their application.
Historical Context and Precedent
Judge Gustilo notes the precedent of judges who retired in October receiving a December thirteenth month pay. He invokes a policy of leniency historically afforded to retiring judges regarding the inclusion of benefits.
Office of the Court Administrator’s Memorandum
In a memorandum dated June 18, 2004, the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) recommended granting Judge Gustilo's request, citing his exemplary service and contributions to court innovations and administration. They argued it would be fair and just to grant him the second tranche.
Chief Attorney’s Report
Despite the recommendation from the OCA, Chief Attorney Edna E. Diño submitted a counter-report on July 15, 2004, advising that the request be denied. She argued that including the yet-to-be-implemented second tranche is inconsistent with Republic Act No. 9227 and the associated guidelines.
Court’s Ruling
The Court ultimately sided with the Chief Attorney, affirming the clear language of Section 5 of Republic Act No. 9227 that only allowances that were “actually received” and “already implemented” by the date of retirement could be counted. This rigid interpretation negated any potential for liberal application that may favor Judge Gustilo’s standpoint.
Legislative Intent
Discussions among lawmakers during the enactment of the legislation revea
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. No. RTJ-04-1868)
Case Background
- Judge Tito G. Gustilo, serving at the Regional Trial Court of Iloilo City, Branch 23, is due to retire on September 29, 2004, at the age of 70, after 21 years of service, including 7 years and 11.5 months as Executive Judge.
- In a letter dated May 26, 2004, Judge Gustilo requests the inclusion of the second tranche of the Special Allowance, as per Republic Act No. 9227, in his retirement benefits computation.
- The Special Allowance under Republic Act No. 9227, effective November 11, 2003, provides additional compensation to judges equivalent to 100% of their basic monthly salary, implemented in four tranches.
Relevant Legislation and Guidelines
Republic Act No. 9227:
- Grants a Special Allowance of 25% of the basic monthly salary to judges, with subsequent tranches dependent on funding.
- Section 5 specifies that only allowances actually received and implemented at the time of retirement shall be included in retirement benefits.
Guidelines on Special Allowance:
- Implemented uniformly at 25% of the actual basic monthly salary, beginning November 11, 2003.
- Specifies that only the allowance received and accrued at retirement is considered for benefits.
Judge Gustilo's Argument
- Judge Gustilo argues for inclusion of the second tranche of the Special Allowance, anticipated for implementation on November 11, 2004, just over a month after his retirement.
- He