Title
Re: Lost Checks Issued to the Late Roderick Roy P. Melliza; and Dropping from the Rolls of Ms. Esther T. Andres
Case
A.M. No. 2005-26-SC
Decision Date
Nov 22, 2006
A former Supreme Court employee was found guilty of dishonesty and gross misconduct for mishandling and encashing checks intended for a deceased colleague, leading to her dismissal, forfeiture of benefits, and reimbursement of the encashed amount.

Case Summary (A.M. No. 2005-26-SC)

Background of Loss and Investigation Initiation

Upon processing the death benefits for Melliza, it was discovered that salary checks for the months following his death were mailed out despite the office being informed of his passing. The Clerk of Court, Roberto Guillergan, returned the unclaimed checks to the Court Administrator, but inquiries revealed that several of these checks had been negotiated. Consequently, the Chief of the Financial Management Office recommended further investigation by the Complaints and Investigation Division (CID) concerning the missing checks.

Official Procedures and Employee Involvement

Rod Lanche Jr., as the Receiving Clerk of incoming mails, and Diosdado Makasiar, Clerk II, were responsible for handling the checks addressed to the Court Administrator. Their testimonies outlined the standard procedures for receiving, opening, and processing such checks, implicating Andres as part of the chain of custody for the checks in question. The absence of the missing checks from lists maintained by Eduardo Espinola, in charge of checks disbursement, raised suspicions further against Andres, who had the authority to open envelopes and sort mail.

Resignation and AWOL Status

On September 1, 2005, shortly before a scheduled formal investigation, Andres submitted her resignation and subsequently went AWOL. Efforts to bring her in for investigation were thwarted by her refusal to participate. The Office of the Administrative Services (OAS) noted her resignational letter was not accepted and recommended holding acceptance in abeyance pending investigation outcomes.

Investigation Findings and Employee Testimonies

Testimonies from court employees identified Andres's role in the handling of the checks, revealing a link between her actions and the loss of the paychecks. The investigation called into question her absence during proceedings and her abrupt resignation amid ongoing inquiries, viewed as indicators of guilt.

Allegation of Dishonesty and Misconduct

The investigation concluded that there was substantial circumstantial evidence suggesting Andres might have engaged in malversation through falsification, given that checks had been encashed without rightful authority. Her consistent absence, lack of communication, and failure to defend herself during investigations were considered as factors that pointed towards her guilt.

Procedural Due Process Considerations

Despite her absence at critical investigative junctures, it was determined that Andres was afforded adequate notice and opportunity to present her side in the proceedings. The prevailing legal interpretation established that the essence of due process in administrative settings is satisfied when the opportunity to be heard is provided.

Conclusion of Administrative Liability

Ultimately, the findings

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.