Title
Razonable vs. Maersk-Filipinas Crewing, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 241674
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2020
Seafarer injured on duty; company-designated physicians failed to issue final medical assessment within required period, rendering disability total and permanent. Entitled to $60K under CBA.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 241674)

Background Facts

Razonable entered into a Contract of Employment with A.P. Moller through Maersk on March 24, 2015 to serve on the vessel MN Maren Maersk for six months. This employment was subject to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the Associated Marine Officers’ and Seamen’s Union of the Philippines (AMOSUP) and the Danish Shipowners’ Association (DSA). Razonable suffered a back injury on May 6, 2015, resulting in a diagnosis of "Prolapse Lumbar Disc L4-L5 and L5-S1." After being repatriated on June 17, 2015, he received treatment and was eventually assessed as unfit for work by the company-designated physician, Dr. Rodolfo P. Bergonio.

Medical Assessments and Dispute

Following his surgery on July 27, 2015, Razonable underwent physical rehabilitation until October 9, 2015. The final assessment by Dr. Bergonio indicated a Disability Grade 11 with a one-third loss of lifting power of the trunk. Razonable rejected this assessment, seeking total and permanent disability benefits instead. A subsequent evaluation by Dr. Manuel Fidel Magtira stated that Razonable was permanently unfit for seafaring duties. However, the respondents failed to address Razonable's request for a third doctor’s opinion and ignored further communication from Razonable’s counsel.

Administrative Rulings

Razonable filed a complaint for total disability benefits amounting to $80,000, alongside moral damages and attorney's fees. The National Conciliation and Mediation Board ruled in favor of Razonable, granting him the total disability benefits sought. This decision was appealed by the respondents to the Court of Appeals (CA), which overturned the NCMB's ruling, arguing that the injury was not accidental and that Razonable's entitlement to benefits was limited to the Disability Grade 11 assessment.

Court of Appeals Decision

The CA found it significant that Razonable’s injury did not stem from a work-related accident and thus amended the benefits due to him, significantly reducing it to $7,465. This finding was based on the assumption that his claim relied on provisions applicable to Filipino ship officers rather than ratings.

Supreme Court's Ruling

On further review in a petition under Rule 45, the Supreme Court declared that the CA's ruling was erroneous. The Court found that the company-designated physician failed to issue a valid and final assessment within the prescribed time limits according to the POEA-SEC. The Court noted that the assessments provided were neither conclusive nor definitive, which led to the conclusion that Razonable was entitled to total and permanent disability benefits.

Entitlement to Be

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.