Title
Razon vs. Intermediate Appellate Court
Case
G.R. No. 74306
Decision Date
Mar 16, 1992
Dispute over 1,500 E. Razon, Inc. shares registered under Juan T. Chuidian; Enrique Razon claimed ownership but failed to prove transfer. Supreme Court ruled Chuidian as rightful owner, entitling his estate to dividends and pre-emptive rights. Dead Man’s Statute inapplicable.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 74306)

Factual Antecedents

Enrique Razon organized E. Razon, Inc. in 1962 with several nominal incorporators. Business operations commenced in 1966. Stock Certificate No. 003 for 1,500 shares was registered in the name of Juan T. Chuidian, who served as director and received compensation. Razon admitted financing the subscriptions and alleged an oral agreement that he retained beneficial ownership, with Chuidian’s right to purchase. The certificate was held by Razon and eventually deposited under joint custody at Philippine Bank of Commerce.

Issue on Dead Man’s Statute

Razon contended that the appellate court misapplied Section 20(a), Rule 130 of the Rules of Court (the “dead man’s statute”), which bars parties from testifying to transactions with a deceased person. He argued his testimony concerning the oral agreement with Juan Chuidian should not have been excluded.

Admissibility of Petitioner’s Testimony

The Court held the dead man’s statute inapplicable because the action was not against the estate nor based on a claim against it. Moreover, Vicente Chuidian did not object to Razon’s testimony at trial, thereby waiving any statutory prohibition. Consistent with Cruz v. Court of Appeals, once evidence is admitted without timely objection, a court may not disregard it.

Fundamental Issue: Ownership of Shares

Under the Corporation Code, shares stand in the name of the registered holder in the corporate books. E. Razon, Inc.’s records and Chuidian’s election as director confirmed his status as registered shareholder. Razon, as claimant, bore the burden of proving a valid transfer to vest ownership in himself.

Requirements for Valid Transfer of Shares

Section 35 of the Corporation Code mandates that a transfer of shares requires a properly indorsed certificate delivered to the transferee and recorded in the corporate books. Absent by-laws governing transfers, these statutory procedures are mandatory, as reaffirmed in Embassy Farms, Inc. v. Court of Appeals.

Court’s Determination on Share Ownership

No indorsement of Stock Certificate No. 003 in favor of Razon was produced. Razon’s reliance on an oral arrangement—even among friends—could not substitute for the indorsement and recording required by law. The Court thus upheld the presumption of ownership in Chuidian and credited evidence that the shares were compensation for his legal services to the corporation.

Modifications on Dividend Rights (G.R.


...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.