Title
R.N. Symaco Trading Corp. vs. Santos
Case
G.R. No. 142474
Decision Date
Aug 18, 2005
A lease dispute involving Malabon Fish Brokers Association and Norma Symaco centered on corporate opportunity doctrine, dismissed due to lack of standing.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 140765)

Contractual Background

On April 30, 1980, a lease agreement was executed between Mariano Guison, the lessor, and the Malabon Fish Brokers Association, Inc. (MFBAI), the lessee. The lease encompassed five parcels of land with an initial rental of P600.00 per month, and Guison received an advance rental of P28,000.00 for four years. After Guison's passing, an unnotarized renewal lease was executed in 1990 between the heirs of Mariano Guison and Norma Symaco on behalf of Symaco Corporation, with significantly higher monthly rental terms.

Corporate Disputes and SEC Involvement

Amidst operational challenges, MFBAI faced internal leadership conflicts, leading to the approval and subsequent amendment of its By-Laws in 1983. A dispute arose when faction leaders contested the legitimacy of these changes, culminating in SEC Case No. 2521, which ruled on the legitimacy of corporate members and upheld the previous By-Laws. The SEC concluded that MFBAI had only 35 legitimate members at its inception, excluding Santos.

Legal Proceedings

After the death of Guison and the failure of MFBAI to renew its lease, Santos alleged wrongdoing against the Symaco Corporation, claiming a violation of corporate opportunity principles. Santos filed an action for the annulment of the April 30, 1990 contract of lease, asserting he acted as a nominal party on behalf of the MFBAI, which he claimed suffered due to the lease agreement with Symaco. The court was presented with conflicting testimonies about Santos' status as a member of MFBAI as well as the legitimacy of the lease agreements.

Rulings by Lower Courts

The trial court dismissed Santos's complaint, reasoning that he and most intervenors were not bona fide members of MFBAI. It found that the principles of corporate opportunity had not been violated by Norma Symaco and that the contract with the MFBAI’s current leaseholders was valid. This ruling was appealed by Santos, leading to a reversal by the Court of Appeals, which indicated a violation of corporate opportunity by Norma Symaco in the negotiation of the lease while a lessor to MFBAI.

Final Resolutions and Appeals

The case went through cycles of reconsideration, with the CA initially affirming the trial court’s ruling, only to reverse itself again, attributing standing to Santos based on his alleged membership. However, upon further evaluation, the Supreme Court ultimately resolved that the findings regarding Santos's membership were authoritative and bin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.