Title
Supreme Court
Quizon vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 177927
Decision Date
Feb 15, 2008
A candidate challenged his opponent's residency and district eligibility in a congressional race, but the Supreme Court dismissed the mandamus petition as moot, upholding the COMELEC's resolution and affirming the validity of votes cast for the winning candidate.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 177927)

Background of the Case

On April 17, 2007, Quizon filed a Petition for Disqualification and Cancellation of Certificate of Candidacy (COC) against Puno, alleging that Puno did not meet the residency requirement and had materially misrepresented his address in his COC. Quizon claimed that Puno falsely asserted residency at 1906 Don Celso Tuazon, Valley Golf, Antipolo City, for four years and six months prior to the elections, when he was actually residing in Quezon City. Following this, Quizon filed a Supplementary Petition, asserting that Puno's candidacy was invalid as he misrepresented his legislative district.

The Petition for Mandamus

Quizon, dissatisfied with the delay in the resolution of his petitions by the COMELEC, filed a Petition for Mandamus on June 5, 2007, asking the court to compel the COMELEC to act on the disqualification petitions. Puno countered that the COMELEC had already resolved the matter on July 31, 2007, dismissing Quizon’s disqualification petitions, and argued that the petition for mandamus was therefore moot.

COMELEC's Resolution and Arguments

The COMELEC Second Division, in its resolution, affirmed Puno’s residency and qualification to run for office, leading to Quizon’s motion for reconsideration which had yet to be resolved at the time of the petition for mandamus. Puno challenged the mandamus on grounds of mootness and discretionary duty, while the Office of the Solicitor General echoed that position and redirected any qualification disputes to the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET).

The Court's Dismissal of the Petition

The court dismissed the petition for mandamus, clarifying that its primary function is to command the performance of a clear ministerial act, rather than to investigate or adjudicate disputes. Given that the COMELEC had already acted on Quizon's original petitions, there was no longer any duty for the COMELEC to perform, rendering the petition moot. The court emphasized that cases may only proceed if they do not present a justiciable controversy due to supervening events, and none of the exceptions to this rule applied in this instance.

Legal Principles Involved

The ruling underscored that the issuance of mandamus is predicated on the existence of a clear legal right of the petitioner, and a corresponding duty on the part of the respondent to perform a specific act. The court emphasized that since Puno was not declared disqualified prior to the election, any votes cast for him could not be counted as stray. The discussion of Section 78 of the Omnibus Election Code was critical to reaffirming that delays in resolution did not invalidate Puno’s candidacy, as this section allows for the timing

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.