Title
Prudential Bank and Trust Co. vs. Community Builders Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. L-31600
Decision Date
Sep 12, 1988
Prudential Bank sued Community Builders and Alpha Insurance over unpaid credit, secured by savings and receivables. SC ruled the second deed was security, not sale, holding Community, Alpha, and Rojas liable for the balance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-31600)

Factual Background

The dispute arises from two deeds of assignment executed between Prudential and Community Builders concerning an overdraft facility provided by Prudential. The first deed assigned Community’s rights to a savings account and allowed Prudential to apply it to any outstanding balances. The second deed, which is the crux of the controversy, assigned Community’s interest in ten percent of collections under a contract with the Republic of the Philippines for construction of an Armed Forces facility, purportedly as security for a loan amounting to P140,000.

Legal Issue

The sole issue under review pertains to whether the second deed of assignment is interpreted as security for Community's obligations or an outright sale of receivables. The Manila Court of First Instance originally dismissed Prudential’s complaint, concluding that the deed operated to release Community from its debt.

Judgement of the Lower Court

The initial judgment held that the term "security" within the second deed was superfluous and did not affect the legal interpretation of the document. This interpretation was challenged by Prudential in its appeal.

Appellate Court’s Ruling

Upon appellate review, the court ruled in favor of Prudential. It emphasized the cardinal rule of contract interpretation, asserting that the plain meaning of clear terms should govern unless the parties’ intent is otherwise evident. The appellate analysis revealed that both deeds of assignment were intended as security for Community’s loan obligations, particularly given their contemporaneous execution and the context of a surety bond by Alpha Insurance.

Interpretation of the Deeds

The deeds explicitly indicated that they were meant to secure payment for the amounts owed by Community to Prudential. The second deed referred to future collections from government contracts, reinforcing that they should serve as collateral for both existing debts and future credit accommodations. This was further corroborated by the prior arrangement where Community's savings deposit was used to offset outstanding loans.

Liability Assessment

Eventually, the appellate court concluded that Community Builders was liable for the outstanding balance of P44,533.86, with Prudential authorized to charge interest and legal fees as stipulated. Alpha Insurance was held solidarily liable to Prudential up to P40,000, and both Community Builders and Rojas were mandated to reimburse Alpha for any amounts

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.