Title
Province of Zamboanga del Norte vs. City of Zamboanga
Case
G.R. No. L-24440
Decision Date
Mar 28, 1968
Zamboanga City and Zamboanga del Norte disputed ownership of properties post-province division; Supreme Court ruled patrimonial properties require compensation, public ones do not.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 183239)

Key Dates

October 12, 1936 – Commonwealth Act No. 39 creates Zamboanga City and mandates purchase of abandoned provincial properties
1945 – Provincial capital transferred from Zamboanga City to Dipolog
June 16, 1948 – Republic Act No. 286 designates Molave as provincial capital
May 26, 1949 – Auditor General’s Appraisal Committee fixes value of properties at ₱1,294,241.00
June 6, 1952 – Republic Act No. 711 divides old province into Zamboanga del Norte and Zamboanga del Sur
January 11, 1955 – Auditor General allocates 54.39% of assets to Zamboanga del Norte
March 17, 1959 – Executive Secretary ruling revokes prior transfer of properties to city
June 17, 1961 – Republic Act No. 3039 transfers all former provincial properties to city free of charge
March 5, 1962 – Petition for declaratory relief and injunction filed
August 12, 1963 – Trial court judgment declaring RA 3039 unconstitutional
March 28, 1968 – Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

1935 Philippine Constitution (protection against deprivation of private property without due process and just compensation);
Commonwealth Act No. 39; Republic Acts Nos. 286, 711, and 3039; Civil Code Arts. 423–424; principles of municipal corporations law

Incorporation and Statutory Acquisition Obligation

Commonwealth Act No. 39 converted the Municipality of Zamboanga into Zamboanga City and provided that upon transfer of the provincial capital, the city “will acquire and pay for” all abandoned provincial buildings and lands at a price fixed by the Auditor General. Fifty Torrens-titled lots and improvements in Zamboanga City were enumerated.

Provincial Capital Transfer and Appraisal

Following the 1945 transfer of the capital to Dipolog and the 1948 designation of Molave, the Auditor General’s Appraisal Committee in 1949 valued the 50 parcels at ₱1,294,241.00. No immediate payment followed.

Division of Old Province and Apportionment of Assets

Republic Act No. 711 (1952) split the old Province of Zamboanga into del Norte and del Sur, directing equitable division of assets and liabilities. The Auditor General in 1955 allocated 54.39% (₱704,220.05) of the total value to Zamboanga del Norte, establishing its claim against Zamboanga City.

Executive Ruling and Initial Deductions

A 1959 Executive Secretary ruling recognized Zamboanga del Norte’s vested co-ownership pro-indiviso of the 50 properties and revoked a 1951 Cabinet resolution granting the properties to Zamboanga City for ₱1.00. The Secretary of Finance then ordered quarterly deductions totalling ₱57,373.46 from the city’s internal revenue allotments, credited toward the ₱704,220.05 debt.

Enactment of RA 3039 and Controversy

Republic Act No. 3039 (1961) amended CA 39 to transfer free of charge all former provincial properties to Zamboanga City. The Secretary of Finance halted further deductions and directed reimbursement of the ₱57,373.46 to the city. Zamboanga del Norte had reimbursed ₱43,030.11 before filing suit.

Proceedings in Lower Court and Initial Judgment

Zamboanga del Norte sought declaratory relief and injunction, alleging deprivation of property without due process and just compensation under the 1935 Constitution. The trial court (1963) declared RA 3039 unconstitutional insofar as it deprived patrimonial properties, ordered the city to pay ₱704,220.05 in quarterly installments, and mandated the province to deed the properties upon full payment. A post-judgment motion granted lump-sum payment with interest, which the Supreme Court later reviewed.

Nature of Municipal Property: Public vs. Patrimonial

The Court applied the rule that municipal property held for public or governmental purposes is public property subject to congressional control, while patrimonial property (held in a private capacity) cannot be taken without due process and just compensation. The character depends on the intended and actual use.

Application of Civil Code Classification

Under Civil Code Arts. 423–424, public use property includes streets, squares, fountains, public works for free and indiscriminate use; all other municipal lands are patrimonial. By this test, only the two high-school playground lots qualified as public; the remainder were patrimonial, since institutional sites (capitol, schools, hospital) did not constitute free, public works.

Application of Municipal Corporations Law

By municipal-corporation principles, lands devoted to governmental functions (administration, education, health) are public. Precedents held that school sites, courthouses, markets, etc., are public property beyond attachment. Adopting this norm, 24 of the 50 parcels (capitol site, school

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.