Title
Province of Maguindanao Del Norte vs. Bureau of Local Government Fice, Regional Office No. XII
Case
G.R. No. 265373
Decision Date
Nov 13, 2023
Maguindanao division plebiscite ratified; Sinsuat abandoned governorship claim by assuming Vice Governor role, rendering mandamus moot.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 265373)

Petitioner’s Claim and Relief Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus with a preliminary mandatory injunction to compel BLGF Region XII to process petitioner’s designation of a Provincial Treasurer (Alonzo or any qualified person designated by petitioner) pursuant to the transitional provisions of Republic Act No. 11550. Petitioner alleged respondents refused to recognize Sinsuat’s authority to recommend the Provincial Treasurer.

Statutory and Constitutional Framework

Applicable law: Republic Act No. 11550 (charter creating Provinces of Maguindanao del Norte and Maguindanao del Sur), particularly Transitory Provisions Sections 48, 50, and 51. Constitutional basis: 1987 Constitution (applicable because the decision postdates 1990), including Article VII, Section 16 (appointment powers of the President). Procedural rules: Rule 71, Sections 3–4 of the Revised Rules of Court (indirect contempt), and standards for mandamus. Relevant precedents quoted include Sangguniang Bayan of San Andres v. Court of Appeals; Defensor‑Santiago v. Ramos; and authorities on mandamus requisites and contempt procedures cited in the decision.

Antecedent Facts and Pleadings

RA 11550 was signed May 27, 2021. Section 48 provided for a plebiscite within 90 days of effectivity; COMELEC deferred the plebiscite until after the 2022 National and Local Elections (NLE). COMELEC conducted the plebiscite on September 17, 2022, ratifying RA 11550. Under Section 50 transitional governance, Sinsuat (elected Vice Governor of then‑Maguindanao) and Mastura (next ranking Sanggunian member) assumed Governor and Vice Governor respectively for Maguindanao del Norte. On December 20, 2022, Sinsuat requested BLGF Region XII to designate Alonzo as Provincial Treasurer in concurrent capacity under Section 51. BLGF Region XII deferred seeking legal guidance. Petitioner filed the mandamus petition. The Court earlier issued a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction ordering BLGF Region XII to process Alonzo’s designation and later, by Decision dated June 26, 2023, made the writ permanent and granted the petition.

Supervening Executive Appointments and Interim Developments

On April 4, 2023, the President appointed Abdulraof Macacua and Bai Mariam Sangki Mangudadatu as OICs (Governor of Maguindanao del Norte and Maguindanao del Sur, respectively). Macacua took an oath on April 5, 2023. MILG issued a Certificate of Recognition to Macacua as OIC Governor on April 24, 2023; Macacua assumed office. On April 26 and April 28, 2023, the President appointed several officers including Macacua and Sinsuat as Governor and Vice Governor respectively; both accepted and took oaths on April 28, 2023. BLGF Region XII later designated Zaira E. Ala as Acting Provincial Treasurer effective April 24, 2023 upon Sinsuat’s recommendation.

Motions and Reliefs Pending After the June 26, 2023 Decision

Three post‑decision motions were filed: (1) Omnibus Motion by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), on behalf of BLGF Region XII and BLGF Central, seeking reversal and referral to the Court En Banc and oral arguments; (2) Motion for Reconsideration by MILG seeking reversal; and (3) Motion to Cite Respondents for Indirect Contempt filed by petitioner alleging disobedience of the June 26, 2023 Decision and other obstructive acts by respondents and third parties.

Issues Presented to the Court

  1. Whether Sinsuat abandoned her claim to the governorship by accepting appointment, oath, and assumption of office as Vice Governor.
  2. Whether issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling BLGF Region XII to process the Provincial Treasurer appointment remains proper after the President’s appointments and assumption to office of Macacua (Governor) and Sinsuat (Vice Governor).
  3. Whether petitioner’s Motion to Cite respondents for indirect contempt should succeed.

Court’s Disposition

The Court granted the OSG’s Omnibus Motion and MILG’s Motion for Reconsideration in the main (but denied referral to the Court En Banc and oral arguments), reversed its June 26, 2023 Decision, dismissed the Petition for Mandamus as moot, and dissolved the writs of mandamus and preliminary mandatory injunction. The Court denied petitioner’s motion for indirect contempt for lack of merit but ordered Bai Fatima Ainee L. Sinsuat to show cause within 10 days why she should not be cited in contempt for failure to promptly inform the Court of her appointment, oath taking, and assumption as Vice Governor.

Finding and Legal Standards on Abandonment of Office

The Court applied the doctrine that abandonment is a species of resignation—voluntary relinquishment of an office accompanied by intent to terminate possession and control. Two elements are required: (1) an intention to abandon; and (2) an overt or external act effecting that intention. The Court relied on Sangguniang Bayan of San Andres and similar authorities to identify relevant indicia (silence, failure to perform duties, failure to collect remuneration, affirmative acts taking another office, oath and assumption of duties in another office, and failure to object to a successor).

Application of Abandonment Doctrine to Sinsuat

The Court concluded that Sinsuat manifested intent to abandon the governorship and effected it by external acts: she did not object when the President appointed Macacua and he assumed office; she ceased to discharge gubernatorial functions during the interim; she accepted appointment and oath as Vice Governor on April 28, 2023 (before the President); and she assumed and performed duties as Vice Governor while Macacua acted as Governor. Her silence and failure to challenge the appointments through proper legal action reinforced the abandonment finding.

Mootness Analysis and Exceptions Considered

Given Sinsuat’s abandonment, the Court held the controversy had become moot because it no longer presented a justiciable controversy: the resolution would be of no practical use. The Court reviewed recognized exceptions to mootness (grave constitutional issues, exceptional character, paramount public interest, opportunity to guide bench/bar/public, and capable of repetition yet evading review) and found none applicable. The province had begun functioning under Presidential appointees; the circumstances were not likely to recur identically; and no exigent constitutional issue remained.

Mandamus Requisites and Why Mandamus No Longer Appropriate

The Court reiterated the requisites for mandamus (clear legal right; duty of defendant; unlawful neglect; ministerial act; no adequate remedy). It found the first requisite—clear legal right—absent because Macacua’s appointment and assumption to

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.