Title
Supreme Court
Province of Maguindanao Del Norte vs. Bureau of Local Government Fice, Regional Office No. XII
Case
G.R. No. 265373
Decision Date
Nov 13, 2023
Maguindanao division plebiscite ratified; Sinsuat abandoned governorship claim by assuming Vice Governor role, rendering mandamus moot.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 265373)

Petitioner

Province of Maguindanao del Norte, represented by Acting Governor Fatima Ainee L. Sinsuat, sought to compel the Bureau of Local Government Finance (Regional Office XII) to process the concurrent designation of a Provincial Treasurer under Section 51 of RA 11550.

Respondents

  1. Bureau of Local Government Finance, Regional Office XII, represented by Acting Regional Director June Ann C. Abella
  2. BLGF Central Office, represented by OIC Executive Director Ma. Pamela P. Quizon
  3. Ministry of the Interior and Local Government of BARMM, represented by Minister Naguib G. Sinarimbo

Key Dates

• May 27, 2021 – Enactment of RA 11550 dividing Maguindanao
• September 17, 2022 – Plebiscite ratifies division
• December 20, 2022 – Sinsuat requests treasurer designation
• February 1, 2023 – BLGF Region XII defers pending legal guidance
• April 4–5, 2023 – Presidential appointments of OICs and oaths
• June 26, 2023 – Supreme Court grants mandamus, makes injunction permanent
• November 13, 2023 – Supreme Court reverses decision, dismisses petition

Applicable Law

• Transitory Provisions of RA 11550 (Sections 48–51)
• 1987 Constitution, Article VII, Section 16 (Presidential appointment power)
• Rules on Mandamus (Revised Rules of Court, Rule 65)
• Rules on Contempt (Revised Rules of Court, Rule 71)

Issue

  1. Whether Sinsuat abandoned her gubernatorial claim by accepting and assuming the Vice Governorship.
  2. Whether a writ of mandamus remains appropriate after supervening appointments.
  3. Whether respondents qualify for indirect contempt for alleged disobedience and misrepresentation.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court granted the government’s motions, reversed the June 26, 2023 decision, dismissed the mandamus petition as moot, dissolved all writs, denied referral en banc and oral argument, denied the contempt motion, and ordered Sinsuat to show cause for potential contempt for failing to inform the Court of her acceptance and assumption as Vice Governor.

Reasoning on Abandonment

The Court applied established doctrine: abandonment requires intent and an overt external act. By accepting her Vice Governor appointment, taking her oath before the President, and discharging vice gubernatorial duties without objection to the gubernatorial appointment of Macacua, Sinsuat manifested intent and effectuated her relinquishment of the Acting Governor role.

Reasoning on Mootness

Sinsuat’s abandonment removed the live controversy over her authority to recommend a Provincial Treasurer. With Macacua validly appointed and exercising gubernatorial powers, any relief would be purely advisory. None of the recognized exceptions to mootness applied.

Reasoning on Mandamus

Mandamus requires a clear legal right and a corresponding ministerial duty. The supervening gubernatorial appointment created a bona fide doubt as to who holds the authority to recommend the Provincial Treasurer. Thus, the first requisite for mandamus—a certain right—was absent.

Reasoning on Contempt

Indirect contempt proceedings demand a verified petition or court‐initiated charge, not a mere motion. The petitioner’s motion failed to comply with Rule 71’s

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.