Title
Province of Bataan vs. Casimiro
Case
G.R. No. 197510-11
Decision Date
Apr 18, 2022
Bataan officials accused of irregularities in patrol boat procurement, facing graft and falsification charges; Supreme Court dismisses petitions, upholds Ombudsman's findings.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 197510-11)

Factual Background

The case centers around alleged irregularities in the procurement of a patrol boat by local officials in Bataan. A request for a patrol boat with a 6-cylinder engine was made, and after the failure of public biddings, a selective bidding was conducted, leading to an award of contract for a boat with a 4-cylinder engine instead, despite earlier documentation indicating a different specification. This led to allegations of misconduct, dishonesty, and violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act by the involved public officials and Asistin.

Issuances from the Ombudsman

The Ombudsman issued several resolutions against the public officials involved: a decision dated May 12, 2011, found them guilty of grave misconduct and dishonesty resulting in their dismissal; and a subsequent resolution on May 16, 2011, found probable cause to indict them criminally under Section 3(e) of RA 3019. The Ombudsman further alleged that the public officials were complicit in a conspiracy that resulted in the procurement anomalies.

Allegations of Misconduct

The allegations against the public officials included altering procurement documents, failing to conduct a legitimate bidding process, and providing unwarranted benefit to Asistin, a non-qualified supplier. Moreover, financial transactions related to the payment for the patrol boat were also scrutinized, leading to claims of falsification of public documents.

Proceedings Before the Sandiganbayan

As a result of the Ombudsman's findings, Information was filed with the Sandiganbayan against the involved public officials. The Sandiganbayan found sufficient grounds to issue warrants of arrest and begin criminal proceedings. The officials contested the legal validity of the charges, questioning the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction and the alleged mishandling of procurement processes.

Petitions for Certiorari

The Province of Bataan and the accused individuals filed consolidated petitions for certiorari before the Supreme Court, seeking a review of the Ombudsman's actions and the validity of the charges filed against them. They argued that the charges were unfounded, citing the absence of wrongdoing and claiming that the process followed was lawful and justified.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions on

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.