Title
Professional Regulation Commission vs. Philippine Society of Mechanical Engineers
Case
G.R. No. 254282
Decision Date
Sep 14, 2021
Dispute over 2016 PSME presidency; PRC Office Order No. 2016-56 recognized Engr. Conti, later voided by RTC. Supreme Court ruled case moot, no practical relief.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 254282)

Petitioner and Respondent

Petitioner: Professional Regulation Commission (PRC)
Respondent: Philippine Society of Mechanical Engineers (PSME), represented by Engr. Murry F. Demdam

Key Dates

• October 21–25, 2015: PSME 63rd National Convention and Board election
• November 22 & 25, 2015: PSME-COMELEC Omnibus Resolution and officer election favoring Conti
• December 18, 2015 & February 10, 2016: PRC recognition by Office Order No. 2016-56 of Conti as PSME President
• August 8, 2016: RTC Branch 24 decision in intra-corporate suit voiding Conti’s officer election
• August 31, 2017: RTC Branch 6 dismissal of petition for nullity as moot and res judicata
• March 10, 2020 & September 21, 2020: Court of Appeals decision reversing dismissal and denial of reconsideration
• September 14, 2021: Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (decision date post-1990)
• Republic Act No. 8981 (PRC Modernization Act of 2000)

Antecedent Facts

  1. PSME held its national convention and elected a Board (Oct. 25, 2015) under Engr. Ocampo’s supervision.
  2. Engr. Conti filed a letter-protest alleging irregularities in the Manila Chapter ballots.
  3. Despite scheduled special meeting (Nov. 28, 2015) and Demdam’s group hand-carrying counter-letters, PSME-COMELEC issued an Omnibus Resolution (Nov. 22) annulling 999 NCR votes and declaring Conti’s slate winners.
  4. PSME-COMELEC then conducted officer elections (Nov. 25) electing Conti as National President.
  5. Conti furnished PRC copies of his purported officers; Demdam’s group filed an intra-corporate suit in RTC Branch 24.
  6. Branch 24 upheld the November 22 Omnibus Resolution but voided the November 25 officer election.
  7. PRC Acting Chairperson Chiaco issued Office Order No. 2016-56 recognizing Conti for issuance of Certificates of Good Standing (COGS) to facilitate license renewals.

Procedural History

• March 7, 2016: PSME filed a petition before RTC Branch 6 to nullify PRC Office Order No. 2016-56 for lack of authority.
• RTC Branch 24 (Aug. 8, 2016) decided intra-corporate dispute—invalidating Conti’s officer election.
• PRC, via OSG, moved to dismiss the nullity petition in RTC Branch 6 as moot and barred by res judicata.
• RTC Branch 6 (Aug. 31, 2017) granted the motion, dismissing the nullity petition.
• Court of Appeals (Mar. 10, 2020) reversed, holding neither mootness nor res judicata applied, and remanded for merits.
• CA denied reconsideration (Sept. 21, 2020).
• PRC filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court.

Issue

Whether the petition to declare PRC Office Order No. 2016-56 null has been rendered moot by the RTC Branch 24 decision invalidating Conti’s election as PSME National President.

Ruling

  1. Mootness Doctrine – A controversy becomes moot when supervening events render any practical relief impossible. Here, the Branch 24 decision voided the very officer election that Office Order

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.