Title
Pimentel, Jr. vs. Fabros
Case
A.C. No. 4517
Decision Date
Sep 11, 2006
Lawyers Fabros and Paas fined P10,000 each for certifying falsified election documents in 1995, violating professional ethics and public trust.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 4517)

Nature of the Complaint

The complaint for disbarment against Attys. Fabros and Paas was premised on allegations of engaging in "unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful conduct" regarding their roles as chairman and vice-chairman of the provincial board of canvassers during the 1995 senatorial elections in Isabela. The specific charges outline that the respondents falsified election results through a fraudulent alteration of the Statement of Votes per Municipality, thereby contravening their legal and professional responsibilities.

Duties of the Respondents

As officials of the PBC-Isabela, the respondents were tasked with canvassing the election results from various municipalities and submitting a Provincial Certificate of Canvass to the Commission on Elections (COMELEC). This involved certifying under oath the accuracy and integrity of the canvassed votes, a duty they failed to uphold as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the documentation submitted.

Evidence of Misconduct

The allegations were substantiated by a comparison of the fabricated Statement of Votes with the municipal/city certificates, revealing evidence of vote padding by significant margins for specific candidates. This blatant misconduct signified a deliberate act of falsification rather than mere error, highlighting the respondents' awareness and willful participation in a flawed electoral process.

Respondents' Defense

In their defense, the respondents denied any wrongdoing. Atty. Fabros claimed there was no consent to manipulate the results, asserting the canvassing was conducted transparently. Atty. Paas supported this by attributing discrepancies to human error and fatigue rather than malicious intent. However, both acknowledged signing documents that contained false figures, which undermined their claims of innocence.

Proceedings and Findings

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) conducted an investigation into the complaint, finding the respondents guilty of breaching Rule 1.01 of the Code of Professional Responsibility by engaging in dishonest conduct as licensed attorneys. The IBP's board of governors recommended a penalty of a fine of P10,000 for each respondent, underscoring the need for accountability in their professional duties.

Final Ruling and Implications

The Court upheld the IBP's findings, emphasizing that as public officers, the respondents had an obligation to maintain the integrity o

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.