Title
People vs. Josephine Angsico, Virgilio vs. Dacalos, Felicisimo F. Lazarte, Jr., and Noel A. Lobrido, Accused; Josephine Casenas-Hottle, et al.
Case
G.R. No. 246942
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2023
Public officials convicted for overpaying Triad Construction in a housing project, violating anti-graft laws, causing undue injury to the government.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 246942)

Background of the Case

The case arose from an Information filed against the accused-appellants and two other individuals, Robert P. Balao and Jose M. Cruz, in connection with the Pahanocoy Sites and Services Project in Bacolod City, Negros Occidental. The allegations indicated that, during their respective tenures as public officers of the National Housing Authority (NHA), they conspired to authorize excessive payments to a private construction company, Triad Construction and Development Corporation, for work that was not completed or justified.

Details of the Irregularities

The project was initially awarded to A.C. Cruz Construction but was rescinded due to delays. Subsequently, the contract was transferred to Triad at a higher cost. A subsequent Special Audit by the Commission on Audit (COA) revealed that payments made to Triad far exceeded the allowable limits set by COA regulations, with the accused failing to obtain necessary approvals before making excess payments. The COA identified duplicities in the documentation submitted for payment, revealing a pattern of misconduct among the accused.

Court Proceedings and Rulings

The Sandiganbayan found the accused-appellants guilty of causing undue injury to the government and providing unwarranted benefits to the private contractor. It deemed that the accused exhibited manifest partiality and evident bad faith by facilitating unauthorized payments and failing to adhere to proper bidding processes and contract variation orders.

Appeal and Final Decision

Dissatisfied with the decision, the accused-appellants filed for reconsideration, which was denied. They subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the Sandiganbayan’s ruling against Angsico, Dacalos, Lobrido, and Espinosa, finding their actions to constitute a clear violation of the law. However, the Court acquitted Lazarte due to insufficient evidence linking him to the wrongdoing.

Legal Standards and Analysis

The Supreme Court highlighted the elements necessary to establish the offense under Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, namely: the stat

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.