Title
People vs. Isidro Peralta
Case
G.R. No. L-4497
Decision Date
Feb 18, 1953
Accused Isidro Peralta convicted of treason for 1942 arrests and maltreatment; court upheld credibility of witnesses, dismissed defense objections, and affirmed guilt.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-4497)

Case Background

Originally charged with treason in two counts before the People's Court, the case was transferred to the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte following the dissolution of the former. Subsequent amendments to the information led to the defendant being charged with a total of eleven counts. The defense raised an objection regarding the additional counts due to the lack of preliminary investigation, which was overruled.

Verdict and Sentencing

Peralta was ultimately found guilty on counts 6 and 7, resulting in a sentence of reclusion perpetua, a fine of P10,000, and the payment of costs. The appellant contested the judgment, focusing specifically on the credibility of the witnesses and the procedures leading to the additional counts.

Testimony and Evidence

The offenses outlined in counts 6 and 7 detailed the unlawful arrests of Lino Ratuita and Segundo Rubio, along with the alleged maltreatment inflicted by Peralta and his accomplices. The prosecution's case relied heavily on the testimonies of the victims, which included corroborative accounts from other witnesses such as Urbano Guerrero and Monico Caldito. Ratuita testified that he was assaulted by Peralta and subsequently released after paying him P200.

Defense Arguments

The defense attempted to discredit the testimonies by highlighting minor inconsistencies, such as the inability of Ratuita to recall the names of all policemen involved during his arrest. They also questioned Pedro Balatico's recollection of events. However, the court noted that memory lapses could occur given the passage of time since the events.

Credibility of Witnesses

The court underscored the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, noting their familiarity with Peralta and their consistent testimonies regarding the events. The lower court emphasized that the defense's negative testimony held no weight compared to the positive and direct evidence presented by the prosecution.

Legal Procedures and Preliminary Investigation

Despite the defense's claim regar

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.