Title
People vs. Julian Macion and Mariano Alonzo
Case
G.R. No. L-7027
Decision Date
Aug 30, 1955
Buenaventura Giron was shot and killed in 1951; Julian Macion, Mariano Alonzo, and Macario Hernandez were convicted based on credible witness testimonies, weak alibis, and denied motion for new trial.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 40728)

Overview of the Incident

On the morning of November 28, 1951, Giron was attacked while attempting to retrieve palay (unhusked rice) for ducklings. Witness Rodelio Perea observed Macion firing a pistol at Giron, followed by Alonzo and co-defendant Macario Hernandez attacking Giron with a revolver. Perea immediately identified Macion and Alonzo as the assailants and reported the incident to authorities, expressing concerns for his safety against potential reprisals.

Evidence and Testimonies

Perea’s identification of the defendants was corroborated by Giron’s wife, Justina Tabar, who witnessed Macion and Alonzo fleeing the scene shortly after the shooting. Testimonies suggested prior animosity between Giron and Alonzo stemming from political disagreements, while Hernandez bore a personal grudge against Giron for financial reasons. Both Macion and Alonzo presented alibis claiming they were elsewhere during the incident—Macion asserting he was at home in Tondo, Manila, and Alonzo stating he was in his mother's house nearby.

Court's Findings

The Court of First Instance, presided over by Judge Antonio G. Lucero, conducted a thorough assessment of the evidence presented throughout the trial. The meticulous nature of the trial court’s findings, which detailed witness accounts from both the prosecution and defense, led to the conclusion that the defendants' guilt had been established beyond a reasonable doubt. The court rejected their alibi claims as unconvincing.

Appellants' Motions for New Trial

Subsequent to the conviction, Macion and Alonzo filed motions for a new trial, claiming that they encountered Ernesto Rivera and Jimmy Bruma, who allegedly confessed to the murder. They submitted affidavits from both individuals asserting that Rivera was responsible for Giron’s death. The appellants also suggested that they were coerced into signing an affidavit implicating a policeman named Fabian Oliva.

Court's Decision on Motions

Upon reviewing the motions for a new trial, the court found no merit in the claims made by the appellants. The testimonies of Perea and Tabar were deemed credible and sincere, as the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.