Title
Philippine Transmarine Carriers, Inc. vs. San Juan
Case
G.R. No. 207511
Decision Date
Oct 5, 2020
Seafarer declared fit to work by company doctors within 120 days; conflicting private physician’s opinion disregarded. Entitled to unpaid sickness allowance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 207511)

Applicable Law

The Philippine Constitution and labor laws applicable in this case hinge on the 1987 Philippine Constitution since the decision date is in 2020, alongside the provisions within the Labor Code and the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) Standard Employment Contract of 2000.

Antecedent Facts

San Juan filed a complaint for permanent total disability benefits against PTCI and others, asserting his work-related conditions as a Chief Cook aboard the MV Genmar George T caused hypertension. He underwent a Pre-Employment Medical Examination (PEME) declaring him fit to work, despite a prior condition. After several incidents aboard leading to medical repatriation, subsequent evaluations showed he was fit for duty, though he later sought a second opinion that led to his claim of unfitness for work.

Ruling of the Labor Arbiter

The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of San Juan, granting him disability benefits based on evidence suggesting his illness was work-related and aggravated by his employment. The Arbiter highlighted the lack of rehiring as indicative of unfitness and disregarded the fitness certification from PTCI's doctors, leading to an award of US$66,000 for permanent disability and unpaid sickness allowance.

Ruling of the National Labor Relations Commission

PTCI appealed the Labor Arbiter's decision to the NLRC, who reversed the decision, asserting San Juan failed to establish a compelling connection between his employment and illness. The NLRC emphasized that he received fit-to-work certifications from company-designated physicians, thus negating his claim for permanent total disability benefits and deemed any ongoing health issues nonoccupational.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

San Juan's petition to the CA resulted in the reinstatement of the Labor Arbiter's decision, establishing that his condition was disputably presumed work-related. It was asserted that assessments from company-designated physicians were not conclusively binding as the CA noted the absence of evidence from PTCI justifying San Juan's non-rehire, indicative of his permanent disability.

Issues Raised

The petitioners contended that the CA erred in disregarding medical assessments from company-designated physicians, awarding benefits without sufficient evidence of a causal connection, and erroneously granting additional sickness wages.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing that San Juan did not satisfy the criteria for proving permanent total disability, as defined by law, particularly spotlighting the necessity for issuing a

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an analytical tool focused on understanding Philippine cases deeply, not a general AI assistant.