Title
Philippine Transmarine Carriers, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 123891
Decision Date
Feb 28, 2001
Seafarer declared unfit to work by accredited physician; sought treatment elsewhere due to refusal at Seamen's Hospital. SC upheld NLRC's award of disability benefits, sick wages, and medical reimbursement, emphasizing liberal interpretation of POEA contract and loss of earning capacity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 123891)

Facts of the Case

Carlos Nietes, a licensed Captain and Master Mariner, filed a complaint against PTC seeking payment for disability benefits, sickness wages, and reimbursement of medical expenses, along with attorney’s fees. Nietes was employed from March 1985 until May 17, 1990, primarily serving on M/V MA. ROSARIO. After suffering from illness while aboard, he was hospitalized in Japan and later examined upon returning to the Philippines, where he was declared unfit to work. He sought legal assistance to press his claims for benefits and expenses incurred.

POEA Decision

The POEA issued a decision in favor of Nietes, ordering PTC and its surety to pay him $21,000 as disability benefits and P34,114 for medical reimbursements, along with ten percent of the total as attorney's fees. The award was based on Nietes’ disability which was acknowledged after proper evaluations by medical professionals.

NLRC’s Ruling

Upon appeal by PTC, the NLRC upheld the POEA’s decision, modifying it to delete the award for attorney's fees. The NLRC concluded that Nietes had demonstrated substantial compliance with the requirements for claiming benefits and had provided adequate evidence of his medical condition.

Petitioner’s Contentions

PTC claimed that the NLRC grossly abused its discretion by awarding disability benefits without sufficient proof of permanent disability or the degree thereof. It argued that the absence of such proof was primarily Nietes’ fault and contested the award of sickness wages and reimbursement for medical expenses done by a physician not approved by the company.

Legal Analysis

The primary issue lies in whether there was an abuse of discretion by the NLRC in affirming the POEA's award. Despite the petitioner’s arguments regarding the lack of proof of permanent disability, it was acknowledged that Nietes was declared unfit to work by an accredited physician shortly after his return from Japan. The court emphasized that the focus in disability cases should not be solely on medical evaluations but also on the employee’s ability to earn wages in similar employment.

Findings on Medical Evidence

The court noted that strict rules of evidence do not apply in disability claims and that substantial evidence, as corroborated by licensed physicians, established the causal link between Nietes’ employment and his disability. Past rulings emphasized that disability relates to the incapacity to earn rather than the injury itself.

Reimbursement of Medical Expenses

As for the reimbursement of me

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.