Title
Philippine Savings Bank vs. Chowking Food Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 177526
Decision Date
Jul 4, 2008
Chowking sued PSBank after its employee encashed checks without proper endorsements; SC ruled PSBank negligent, holding it solidarily liable for the loss.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 177526)

Relevant Facts

Between March and August of 1989, Joe Kuan Food Corporation issued five checks in favor of Chowking, amounting to a total of P556,981.86. Chowking's accounting manager, Rino T. Manzano, presented these checks at PSBank’s Bustos branch, where they were cashed solely based on his signature, without the required endorsements from other authorized officers. Subsequently, Manzano misappropriated the proceeds. Upon discovery of the fraud, Chowking demanded reimbursement from PSBank, leading to the filing of a complaint after the bank declined to pay.

Initial Trial Court Ruling

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found in favor of Chowking on August 24, 1998, mandating PSBank and Santos to collectively reimburse Chowking the amount encashed with interest, along with attorney's fees, exemplary damages, and unrealized profits. The court dismissed the complaint against PSBank's president, Antonio S. Abacan. However, on January 11, 1999, the RTC reversed its previous decision and ruled that Chowking's negligence in allowing Manzano to encash the checks was the proximate cause of the loss, thereby dismissing Chowking's complaint against PSBank and Santos.

Court of Appeals Disposition

Chowking appealed the RTC’s decision, and on January 31, 2007, the Court of Appeals (CA) made a ruling reinstating the RTC’s original decision while modifying certain damage awards. The CA concluded that PSBank had acted negligently by cashing checks with insufficient endorsements and reaffirmed Santos's liability for her negligence, highlighting that the bank's internal procedures were not followed.

Legal Principles Invoked

In addressing the claims of negligence and liability, the CA applied relevant provisions of the Civil Code, particularly Articles 2176 and 2180, which govern liability for damages caused by employees in the course of their employment. It emphasized that banks must exercise the highest degree of diligence owing to their significant public trust responsibilities. The CA found that PSBank's failure in supervision and adherence to its own encashment policies led to the negligent actions of Santos, rendering the bank liable.

Issues Presented

The issues brought before the CA included whether Chowking was estopped from asserting its claim against PSBank and whether its own negligence was the proximate cause of its loss. The CA ruled that equitable estoppel did not apply because Chowking had not made any false representations regarding its checks; it had previously all

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.