Title
Philippine National Oil Company vs. Maglasang
Case
G.R. No. 155407
Decision Date
Nov 11, 2008
PNOC expropriated land for a geothermal plant; SC upheld CA's P300/sq.m. valuation, rejecting inflation adjustments and affirming 1994 as the time of taking.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 190147)

Applicable Law

The proceedings are governed by the 1987 Philippine Constitution on eminent domain, as the decision date is November 11, 2008.

Procedural Background

The PNOC initiated two separate expropriation actions in 1994 against the Maglasang brothers, with Civil Case No. 3267-O for Lot No. 11900 and Civil Case No. 3273-O for Lot No. 11907. Following judicial proceedings, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Ormoc City granted writs of possession for both lots and subsequently appointed commissioners to determine just compensation.

Commissioners’ Valuations

The commissioners presented differing valuations for the properties: City Assessor Briccio D. Supremo suggested ₱1,000.00 per square meter; RTC Clerk of Court Bibiano Reforzado recommended ₱900.00; and businessman Augusto T. Pongos valued the lots at ₱400.00 and ₱85.00 per square meter for developed and undeveloped areas, respectively. The RTC settled on an initial valuation of ₱300.00 per square meter, later modified to ₱700.00 per square meter to account for inflation and adjustment factors.

Court of Appeals Decision

Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals (CA) modified the trial court's ruling, reducing the just compensation to ₱300.00 per square meter. It found that the trial court erred in applying inflation and adjustment factors, asserting that compensation should reflect the actual loss suffered by the property owner at the time of expropriation.

Just Compensation Principles

The appellate court emphasized that just compensation is based on the actual value of land at the time of taking, and not augmented by inflation or other economic factors. Thus, they reiterated that the compensation reflects what the property owner truly loses.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The PNOC challenged the CA's decision, arguing that the trial court's valuation of ₱300.00 per square meter lacked evidence and that the properties were misclassified as industrial rather than agricultural land at the time of expropriation. The petition also maintained that compensation should be estimated from the time of possession rather than the filing date.

Determination of Taking

However, it was affirmed that "taking" occurred at the moment the property was legally expropriated, following the filing of the complaint. The Supreme Court concurred that prior possession under a lease agreement with the Maglasangs did not constitute a constitutional taking.

Classification of Land

PNOC's assertion regarding the agric

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.