Title
Supreme Court
Philippine National Bank vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 107109
Decision Date
Feb 6, 1996
Heirs challenged PNB's foreclosure on disputed land; SC ruled PNB not a mortgagee in good faith, invalidating title, ordering property return to heirs.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 135022)

Factual Background

The ownership of the two parcels of land stems from Adriano Alonzo and Damiana Basibas, who had four children: Ambrosio, Hilarion, Hilario, and Gloria Alonzo. After Damiana's death, Adriano married Basilia Daatorin, with whom he had a daughter, Aurelia Alonzo. Following the death of several family members, in 1968, Aurelia executed a deed waiving her interest in the properties in favor of several family members, including Margarita, who was claimed to be the natural daughter of the deceased Ambrosio Alonzo. Subsequently, Margarita sold part of the property to spouses Florencio and Margarita Daa.

Actions Taken by Philippine National Bank

On June 4, 1968, PNB extended a loan of P3,500.00 secured by a mortgage on Lot 1983-B-3. The loan amount was increased over the years, and the Daa spouses defaulted on their payments. PNB foreclosed on the real estate mortgage and eventually became the highest bidder at the foreclosure sale, leading to the issuance of a new title under PNB's name.

Legal Actions by Respondents

The respondents, descendants of Hilario Alonzo, initiated an action before the Regional Trial Court seeking to annul the deed of sale between Margarita and the Daa spouses as well as the mortgage contract with PNB. They argued that Margarita was not a legitimate heir and that PNB acted in bad faith by granting the loan.

Trial Court Decision

On December 14, 1989, the trial court ruled in favor of the respondents. It ordered PNB to be indemnified by the Daa spouses and Margarita Nalda for the loan amount and interest equivalent to the property's proportionate share. The court also ordered the cancellation of PNB's title and the issuance of new titles in favor of the rightful heirs.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

PNB appealed the decision, arguing that the trial court erred in not awarding the fair market value of the property instead of merely the loan amount plus interest. The Court of Appeals rendered a modified decision on September 14, 1992, affirming the trial court's order but removing the award for attorney's fees.

Allegations of Bad Faith Against PNB

The Court of Appeals scrutinized PNB's actions and found that the bank failed to exercise due diligence. The courts highlighted that PNB did not verify the legitimacy of Margarita's claim before lending and did not conduct an ocular inspection, which is standard banking practice.

Supreme Court Decision

Ultimately, PNB's appeal wa

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.