Case Summary (G.R. No. 132593)
Background of the Car Plan Program
The PITC, established by Presidential Decree No. 252 in 1973 to foster Philippine trade, implemented a Car Plan Program on October 19, 1988, allowing qualified officers to purchase vehicles at half the cost subsidized by PITC. This initiative aimed to provide eligible officers with more mobility for official business within Metro Manila.
Legislative Framework
Republic Act No. 6758 (RA 6758), effective July 1, 1989, restructured government compensation systems, aiming to standardize salaries and benefits across government-owned and controlled corporations. The law specifically stated that certain allowances, including representation and transportation allowances, would remain authorized for incumbents; however, it mandated consolidation of most other fringe benefits into standardized salary rates.
DBM-CCC No. 10 Regulations
To implement RA 6758, the DBM issued Corporate Compensation Circular No. 10, which discontinued all allowances and fringe benefits granted beyond the basic salary effective November 1, 1989. Payments made after this cutoff date were deemed illegal disbursements of public funds, leading to the COA's subsequent audit and disallowance of PITC's car plan expense reimbursements.
COA's Initial Decision
Following the disallowance, PITC appealed to the COA, which denied the appeal on July 27, 1992. The COA asserted that the Car Plan constituted a fringe benefit that fell outside the listed allowances permissible under DBM-CCC No. 10. The COA's application of the circular ultimately upheld the disallowance of expenses related to the car plan.
Grounds for Petition
PITC's petition, filed subsequently, articulated three key arguments:
- The legislature did not intend to annul existing benefits received by government employees prior to RA 6758's passage.
- The Car Loan Agreements, executed before RA 6758 came into effect, should be upheld per the constitutional protection against contract impairment.
- PITC asserted exemption from provisions of RA 985, claim that its charter allowed comprehensive control over compensation policies.
Court's Ruling on Legislative Intent
The Court favored PITC's position, observing that the legislative intent was to protect existing benefits for incumbents when RA 6758 was enacted. The Court referenced the prior case of Philippine Ports Authority vs. Commission on Audit, emphasizing that the gradual phase-out of benefits would respect the non-diminution of pay principle.
Analysis of COA's Ruling
The Court found COA's reliance on DBM-CCC No. 10 flawed, noting that the circular had been declared ineffective due to the lack of requisite publication in the Official Gazette. This failure to publish rendered the circular void, meaning COA's disallowance lacked a lawful foundation.
Exemption from RA 6758
Addressing whether PITC was exempt from RA 6758, the Court highlighted that PITC's charter specifically allowed for autonomy concerning
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 132593)
Case Background
- The case is a petition for certiorari under Rule 64 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking to annul the Commission on Audit (COA) Decisions No. 2447 and No. 98-048.
- The petitioner, Philippine International Trading Corporation (PITC), contests the disallowance of car plan benefits for its officers, which were denied by the resident COA auditor.
- The case revolves around the interpretation of Republic Act No. 6758 (RA 6758), which prescribes a revised compensation and position classification system for government employees.
Facts of the Case
- PITC is a government-owned and controlled corporation established under Presidential Decree (PD) No. 252 on July 21, 1973, aimed at promoting and developing Philippine trade.
- On October 19, 1988, PITC's Board of Directors approved a Car Plan Program whereby eligible officers could purchase vehicles with PITC covering 50% of the cost, reimbursing additional expenses related to vehicle registration and insurance.
- Under the Car Plan, eligible officers could pay their share through salary deductions over five years, with specific financial assistance provisions to enhance mobility for official duties.
- The car plan was intended to support the corporation's operations and improve the personal mobility of its officers.
Legislative Context
- RA 6758 took effect on July 1, 1989, consolidating allowances and additional compensations into standardized salary rates while exempting certain allowances, including transportation allowances.
- Following the enactment of RA 6758, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) issued Corporate