Title
Philippine Fisheries Development Authority vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 169836
Decision Date
Jul 31, 2007
The Philippine Fisheries Development Authority, a national government instrumentality, was exempt from real property taxes on the Iloilo Fishing Port Complex, except for leased portions. The Supreme Court ruled the IFPC, as public dominion property, could not be auctioned for tax delinquency.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 45685)

Petitioner and Respondents

Petitioner: Philippine Fisheries Development Authority
Respondents: Court of Appeals; Office of the President; Department of Finance; City of Iloilo

Key Dates

– August 11, 1976: PD 977 creates PFDA under Ministry of Natural Resources
– February 8, 1982: EO 772 renames and reattaches PFDA to Ministry (later Department) of Agriculture
– October 31, 1981: Reclamation of 21 ha in Barangay Tanza, Iloilo City, for IFPC
– May 1988: City of Iloilo assesses IFPC for real property taxes (delinquency P5,057,349.67 for 1988–1989)
– August 30, 1990: Public auction scheduled to satisfy tax delinquency; PFDA seeks injunction and administrative exemption
– March 6, 1992: DOF rules PFDA liable for real property tax on beneficial use but only PFDA‐owned property may be auctioned
– June 21, 2005: Court of Appeals affirms denial of exemption and permits auction of IFPC
– July 31, 2007: Supreme Court issues final decision

Applicable Law

– 1987 Philippine Constitution (applies to decisions from 1990 onward)
– Presidential Decree No. 977 (PD 977), Executive Orders No. 772 and 292 (Administrative Code)
– Local Government Code (LGC) §§ 133(o) (general exemption for national instrumentalities) and 234(a) (real property tax exception on beneficial use by taxable persons)
– Civil Code, Article 420 (public dominion)
– Jurisprudence distinguishing government‐owned or controlled corporations (GOCCs) from instrumentalities (MIAA v. CA, G.R. No. 155650)

Factual Background

The Ministry of Public Works reclaimed a 21-hectare foreshore in Barangay Tanza and constructed the Iloilo Fishing Port Complex (IFPC), including breakwater, landing quay, refrigeration, market and administration facilities. Title remained with the Republic, but PFDA took governance and operation under PD 977. PFDA subsequently leased portions of IFPC to private fishing-related businesses.

Procedural History

After City of Iloilo assessed the entire IFPC for 1988–1989 real property taxes and moved to auction it for unpaid taxes, PFDA sought injunctive relief and administrative tax exemption. The Iloilo Assessor and then the DOF denied exemption, holding PFDA liable for taxes on property it beneficially used. PFDA’s appeal to the Office of the President was likewise dismissed. The Court of Appeals affirmed and allowed auction of IFPC to satisfy the tax delinquency. PFDA petitioned the Supreme Court.

Issues

  1. Is PFDA liable to pay real property tax on IFPC?
  2. If so, may the entire IFPC be sold at public auction to satisfy the delinquency?

Classification as an Instrumentality, Not a GOCC

Under MIAA v. Court of Appeals, an entity is a GOCC only if organized as a stock or non-stock corporation. PFDA’s capital stock is unsubscribed and undivided into shares, and it has no members or distributable dividends; it therefore is not a GOCC. It remains an instrumentality of the national government, vested with governmental and corporate powers under its charter.

Tax Exemption and Limited Liability

Section 133(o) of the LGC grants national instrumentalities broad exemption from local taxation, “unless otherwise provided in this Code.” Section 234(a) creates a single exception: real property owned by the Republic that is granted for the beneficial use of a taxable person becomes subject to real property tax. PFDA’s leases to private entities constituted “beneficial use” by taxable persons, rendering those portions taxable, while the remainder of IFPC remains exempt.

Public Dominion and Prohibition on Auction Sale

Civil Code Article 420 classifies ports and reclaimed lands as property of public dominion, immune from sa

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.